QR code linking to the REBOOT project website
CULTiNVEST
REBOOT ● Erasmus+ KA220-HEDProject No. 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980 From the SoS to Validated NarrativesWP3_T3.2.2 AI-assisted Content Design TrainingWP3_T3.2.4 Development of Stories

UNESCO-listed Medieval City of Rhodes · Street of the Knights, Collachium

The House of Prince Jem

UNESCO World Heritage emblem

A Hospitaller-period mansion on the Street of the Knights, built under the Knight Jean d’Aussay by 1481 and rebuilt in 1514, named for its most celebrated occupant: the fugitive Ottoman prince Jem Sultan, lodged here for some five weeks in 1482. Today it is an archaeological monument administered by the Ephorate of Antiquities of the Dodecanese.

Coat of arms of the Order of St John (Hospitaller cross)

A private house that became, for five extraordinary weeks, the most closely watched address in Christendom — host to the one hostage whose survival kept an empire in check. “Captivus pretiosus, pax incerta” — a precious captive, an uncertain peace

Exceptional High Moderate Qualified
00
Identity

Site & dates

Museum › Street of the Knights, Collachium

Stands on the Street of the Knights (Odos Ippoton) in the Collachium, close to the Palace of the Grand Master, in two connected sections either side of a vaulted lane.

1481
Built, or substantially completed, under the supervision of the Knight Hospitaller Jean d’Aussay, whose carved coat of arms survives on the façade.
1482
Lodges the fugitive Ottoman prince Jem Sultan for around five weeks, at the invitation of Grand Master Pierre d’Aubusson.
1514
Substantially reconstructed after damage from the First Siege of Rhodes (1480) and the earthquake of 1481; a Renaissance entrance doorway rebuilt and dated by an inscription, no longer legible today.
1912 – today
Upper floor rebuilt again under Italian administration after 19th-century earthquake and explosion damage; Greek state ownership from 1947/48; restored as an archaeological monument, free to visit until 15:00.
01
Diplomacy

The most expensive captive

1482–1489 › the most expensive captive of his century

Sultan Bayezid II paid the Order some 45,000 gold ducats a year — roughly € 23 million Euros today — to keep his brother safely, and profitably, far away from pressing his claim to the Ottoman throne.

Flight to Rhodes, 1481–82
Defeated by his brother near Yenişehir and unable to reach Egypt, Jem took refuge at the Hospitallers’ castle of St Peter and sought Grand Master Pierre d’Aubusson’s protection.
The ceremonial reception
Received by lords of the Grand Cross to cannon salutes, Jem processed on a magnificent horse to the church of S. Sebastiano, where d’Aubusson waited amid his assembled knights.
The cost of a royal captive
Bayezid agreed 45,000 ducats a year for Jem’s custody; per Halil İnalcık’s research, only 35,000 was earmarked for Jem himself, the remaining 10,000 — and further undisclosed sums — going to d’Aubusson personally.
Detail of Pinturicchio's 1492 fresco The Disputation of St Catherine, showing Jem Sultan beside Lucrezia Borgia depicted as St Catherine
Jem Sultan (turbaned, at left) beside Lucrezia Borgia, cast as St Catherine of Alexandria, in Pinturicchio’s 1492 fresco The Disputation of St Catherine, Sala dei Santi, Borgia Apartments, Vatican.
Jem himself separately promised d’Aubusson and the Order 150,000 ducats in repayment, and swore to cede any Christian territory his father had conquered, should he ever gain the throne — promises never put to the test. He left Rhodes after only five weeks, on 1 September 1482, for a further thirteen years of exile in France and Rome.
02
Fabric

What survives

Features › courtyard, staircase, great hall, basement

Two connected sections either side of a vaulted lane, each arranged around an interior courtyard — among the best preserved of the sandstone mansions lining the Street of the Knights.

Exterior & entrance
The two-part complex
Two connected sections either side of a vaulted lane running perpendicular to the Street of the Knights, linked at upper-floor level — characteristic of the larger Hospitaller residences here.
The Renaissance doorway & 1514 inscription
The courtyard is entered through a doorway rebuilt in 1514; an inscription recording the work was still legible on its lintel as late as the early 20th century.
The coat of arms of Jean d’Aussay
The façade carries the carved arms of the Knight credited with supervising the house’s 1481 construction.
Interior
The Hospitaller-style staircase
Rises from the ground-floor entrance to the upper floor, connecting the domestic apartments above to the courtyard and street below.
The Great Hall fireplace
The principal upper-floor room preserves a large fireplace in the Hospitaller style, among the building’s most prominent surviving medieval features.
The basement vaults
Restored with its medieval vaults exposed, now home to a permanent exhibition on the house’s own restoration, viewed in part through glass floor panels over excavated remains.
03
History

Persons & events

1481–1522 › a house, a hostage, a fortune

A private residence whose entire historical weight rests on five weeks in the summer of 1482, and on the thirteen-year diplomatic afterlife that followed.

Jean d’Aussay, Knight Hospitaller
Supervised the house’s construction works in 1481; his coat of arms is built into its façade.
Jem Sultan, Ottoman prince
Lodged in the house for around five weeks in 1482 after fleeing to Rhodes following his defeat by his brother, Sultan Bayezid II.
Pierre d’Aubusson, Grand Master 1476–1503
Invited Jem to Rhodes and negotiated the Order’s custody of him with Bayezid II; later created a cardinal in connection with Jem’s transfer to papal custody.
Guy de Blanchefort, d’Aubusson’s nephew
Commanded the galley that carried Jem from Rhodes to France in September 1482, and later supervised his custody at Bourganeuf.
Sultan Bayezid II
Jem’s elder brother and rival for the Ottoman throne; paid the Order, and later the Papacy, an annual sum for his continued custody in Christian hands.
1912 – today
Reconstructed again under Italian administration after 19th-century damage; restored as a Greek state archaeological monument after 1947/48.
04
Testimony

A Disputed End

1481–1495 › in contemporaries’ own words, and in dispute

Caoursin’s case for Jem’s value, 1481

The Order’s own Chancellor argued that Jem, “kept secure and well but firmly confined,” was a permanent check on Bayezid, who would not dare attack Christian territory — above all Rhodes — so long as his brother remained alive and available as a rival claimant in enemy hands.

Guillaume Caoursin, Vice-Chancellor of the Order, writing in 1481, as reported in this project’s consulted literature.
A mother of three names

This project’s own sources name Jem’s mother, inconsistently, as “Helena Palaiologos,” as “Çiçek Hatun,” and as a Hungarian-born captive named Sonia. Kenneth Setton, the most rigorous source consulted, is markedly more cautious, describing her only as “said to have been a Slavic princess.”

This document follows Setton’s caution and adopts none of the more specific claims as established fact.
Death at Capua, 1495 — poison, or pneumonia?

One tradition describes a poisoned shaving blade carried from Istanbul; the historian Ivan Cloulas instead reads Jem’s recorded symptoms as more consistent with pneumonia, or simply the poor health of a decade-long captive far from home — a reading this document’s narrative follows with due caution.

Compare this project’s heritage-narrative material with Ivan Cloulas (via Setton) and Halil İnalcık’s study of the Innocent VIII–Bayezid II negotiations.
05
Successor

The Successor

1481–1522 › the story as this project’s heritage-interpretation tells it

Alongside the critical, source-by-source treatment above, this project also carries Jem’s story in its fuller, traditional telling — as a piece of living heritage interpretation in its own right, not as settled history.

The Successor

Cem is the third son of Sultan Mehmed II, by a mother later sources name variously — most often as Helena Palaiologos. When the Sultan dies in May 1481, the Grand Vizier sends messengers racing to summon his two surviving sons, Cem and Bayezid, to the capital. The messenger sent to Cem simply disappears. Bayezid reaches Istanbul first, on 21 May 1481, and is declared Sultan. Invited by Grand Master Pierre d’Aubusson, Cem sails for Rhodes. He wants to leave again after only a short time — but Sultan Bayezid speaks the language of money, and for 45,000 ducats a year (a gold ducat then weighed about 3.2 grams, worth roughly €500 in today’s market) Cem is kept in Rhodes instead. The Hospitaller Jean d’Aussay supervises the construction of the “House of Prince Cem.” For thirteen years, Bayezid pays the Hospitallers to keep his brother away from the Ottoman throne: with Cem safely in Christian hands, an Ottoman invasion of Rhodes is out of the question. Only on his death do the Ottomans finally start to move.

As retold in this project’s own heritage-interpretation materials, synthesising the 1481 succession crisis and the Order’s thirteen-year custody of Jem; compare the critical, source-by-source treatment above.
Turkish Playboy

Cem now lives in grand style, a celebrity captive with his own Turkish entourage — first in Rhodes, then in France and Italy. He sails for France on 1 September 1482. In Nice, he goes to balls and meets beautiful women, and composes a couplet of his own:
“What a wonderful place
is this city of Nice —
a man who stays there
can do as he please!”
Cem then spends five years at Bourganeuf, in the Limousin, the Aubusson family’s own ancestral country, under the supervision of Guy de Blanchefort, d’Aubusson’s nephew — held in a prison-like, thick-walled tower that still stands there today. Bayezid, in turn, pays Pope Innocent VIII to keep Cem in Rome, a sum said to equal all the Papacy’s other annual revenues combined. Did Cem ever meet Lucrezia Borgia in Rome? Pinturicchio’s 1494 fresco, showing a turbaned figure identified with Cem alongside Lucrezia, keeps the question alive.

As retold in this project’s own heritage-interpretation materials; the Pinturicchio identification is traditional rather than certain.
Poison

Cem is thirty-six when he dies at Capua on 25 February 1495. Sultan Bayezid’s own gatekeeper is said to have travelled from Istanbul to Capua carrying a poisoned shaving blade. Bayezid declares three days of national mourning and asks for his brother’s body — and, by some accounts, keeps trying to bargain the price of the corpse down in gold even afterwards. Cem’s remains do not reach Bursa for another four years. In 1522, Cem’s eldest son Murad and his two grandsons are brought to Rhodes before Sultan Suleiman. Their fate, too, is sealed.

As retold in this project’s own heritage-interpretation materials; compare the critical treatment of Jem’s death above, including Ivan Cloulas’s alternative reading of pneumonia rather than poison.
06
Gallery

Photo gallery

Eighteen views › from the courtyard to the Roman fresco tradition

07
Assessment

Significance criteria

Nine-criteria framework › International importance

Rarity
Surviving Hospitaller-period domestic residences of this scale and completeness are comparatively rare in the Medieval Town; the house is identified as among the best preserved sandstone mansions on the Street of the Knights.
High
Representativeness
Representative of high-status Hospitaller residential architecture in the Collachium, and of the specific historical practice of housing eminent political refugees and hostages within the Order’s own quarter.
High
Aesthetic value
A Renaissance entrance doorway, Hospitaller-style staircase and great-hall fireplace give it real architectural interest, though modest relative to this project’s grander monuments.
Moderate–High
Integrity
Substantially altered by at least two major reconstructions (1514, and again under Italian administration) and by modern conservation works; how much fabric Jem himself would have recognised in 1482 cannot be confidently assessed.
Moderate
Historical value
Rests overwhelmingly on its association with Prince Jem’s five-week residence in 1482 — an episode with far-reaching consequences for Hospitaller-Ottoman relations and European crusade diplomacy for a decade after.
Exceptional
Symbolic & social value
As the lodging of a defeated Ottoman prince granted asylum, at a price, by an Order that had itself withstood an Ottoman siege two years earlier, the house carries strong symbolic value.
High
Scientific value
Some ongoing value through the excavated remains beneath its glass floor panels and its restoration-history exhibition, though no research programme comparable to the project’s major fortification monuments.
Moderate
Interpretive potential
An intimate domestic monument through which visitors encounter Prince Jem’s thirteen-year odyssey, the Order’s own handling of defectors and hostages, and its own layered restoration history.
Exceptional
Importance level
Rests principally on its unique, exceptionally well-documented association with Prince Jem’s exile, and on its status as a component of the fortified Collachium underpinning the UNESCO property’s Outstanding Universal Value.
International

Statement of significance

“Captivus pretiosus, pax incerta.” (“A precious captive, an uncertain peace.”)

The House of Prince Jem is of outstanding significance as the setting, however brief, for one of the most consequential hostage sagas of late medieval diplomacy. As the sole surviving rival claimant to the Ottoman throne, kept alive and available in Christian hands, Jem Sultan was arguably the single most expensive political captive of the fifteenth century: for as long as he remained in European custody — five weeks at Rhodes in 1482, then thirteen years in France and Rome — he was a formidable check on Sultan Bayezid II, funding first the Order’s own treasury and then the papal court. His death in 1495 removed, at a stroke, the single most formidable weapon available to the West against the Ottoman Empire. This significance must be read together with an honest account of the house’s own integrity: substantially rebuilt in 1514 and again under Italian administration, its surviving fabric cannot be confidently separated into what Jem himself would have known. Notwithstanding these qualifications, the House of Prince Jem remains a monument of international significance: an intimate, well-preserved example of Hospitaller domestic architecture, and a component of the fortified Collachium underpinning the Outstanding Universal Value of the UNESCO-inscribed Medieval City of Rhodes.

National

Protected under Greek Archaeological Law by Ministerial Decision ΥΑ 23084/737 (25 August 1948), ΦΕΚ 10 (23 September 1948), confirmed under Law 3028/2002.

UNESCO

Medieval City of Rhodes (ref. 493), inscribed 1988, criteria (ii), (iv) and (v) — one of the component monuments of the Collachium cited in the property’s Statement of Outstanding Universal Value.

References

  1. Belabre, F. de. Rhodes of the Knights. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1908.
  2. Bonneaud, Pierre. “The Hospitallers of Rhodes and Their Vow of Poverty in the 15th Century (1420–1480).” Imago Temporis. Medium Aevum VII (2013): 299–322.
  3. Burchard, Johann. The Diary of John Burchard of Strasburg, Bishop of Orta and Civita Castellana, Pontifical Master of Ceremonies to Their Holinesses Sixtus IV, Innocent VIII, Alexander VI, Pius III, and Julius II, A.D. 1483–1506. Translated from the Latin text published in Paris, with notes and appendices, by Arnold Harris Mathew. Vol. 1, A.D. 1483–1492. London: Francis Griffiths, 1910.
  4. Caron, M. Djem: Un prince dans la tourmente. Les Éditions du Zeugma, 2010.
  5. Ename Charter for the Interpretation of Cultural Heritage Sites: Preamble, Objectives, Principles. 2004. Available from http://www.enamecenter.org/.
  6. Freely, J. Jem Sultan: The Adventures of a Captive Turkish Prince in Ottoman Europe. London: HarperCollins, 2004.
  7. Hellenic Government Gazette (ΦΕΚ). Ministerial Decision 23084/737 (25 August 1948), ΦΕΚ 10 (23 September 1948), protection of the monuments of the Medieval Town of Rhodes; Law 3028/2002 on the Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in General.
  8. ICOMOS. ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Paris: ICOMOS, 2008.
  9. ICOMOS Australia. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: ICOMOS Australia, 2013.
  10. İnalcık, Halil. “A Case Study in Renaissance Diplomacy: The Agreement between Innocent VIII and Bayezid II regarding Djem Sultan.” In The Middle East and the Balkans under the Ottoman Empire: Essays on Economy and Society, 343–367. Indiana University Turkish Studies and Turkish Ministry of Culture Joint Series, vol. 9. Bloomington: Bilkent University Halil İnalcık Center.
  11. Kollias, Elias. Οι Ιππότες της Ρόδου, το Παλάτι και η Πόλη [The Knights of Rhodes, the Palace and the City]. Athens, 2001.
  12. Luttrell, Anthony T. The Town of Rhodes: 1306–1366. Athens: Archaeological Receipts Fund, 2003. Pp. 203–229.
  13. Miller, Timothy S. “The Knights of Saint John and the Hospitals of the Latin West.” Speculum 53, no. 4 (October 1978): 709–733.
  14. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. The Interpretive Project, Rhodes, Greece: e- and Onsite Course in the Development of Interpretive Skills for Professional Tourism Guides. Greek Ministry of Tourism / University of the Aegean, Rhodes.
  15. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2013. “QR-Rhodes: Experience Diversity Plan. A Cognitive-Emotional Approach.” Southeast Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, Athens.
  16. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., Stavrinoudis, Th., Glyptou, K., and Skoultsos, S. 2013. “QR-RHODES: From the Time Machine to the QR Code. Playrooms for Non-Captive Audiences in the Age of Mobile Telephony — The Approach of the SEE TCP SAGITTARIUS 2011–2014.” In 5th International Scientific Conference “Tourism Trends and Advances in the 21st Century,” 1–14.
  17. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. “Rhodes Building Europe: Knights at Work.” SEE/B/0016/4.3/X SAGITTARIUS, South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme, University of the Aegean, Rhodes.
  18. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. “The Europe of 8. Knights at Work: 1306–1522.” SEE/B/0016/4.3/X SAGITTARIUS, Southeast Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme 2007–2013, University of the Aegean, Rhodes.
  19. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. “Rhodes Building Europe: Knights at Work: 1306–1522.” In Heritage as a Development Mediator: Interpretation and Management, edited by D. Babic, D. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, and V. Vasile, 45–47. Zagreb: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, ISBN 978-953-175-512-2.
  20. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. “2520/Intensive Training Programme for the Tourism Guide Profession in Rhodes, Greece.” Greek Ministry of Tourism.
  21. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. Statements of Significance. Principles, Methodology, Application for the Intensive Training Course of the Profession of Tourist Guides in the Interpretation of Heritage. Rhodes: Greek Ministry of Tourism / University of the Aegean, Vol. I 98 pages, Vol. II 82 pages.
  22. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., and Weiss-Ibanez, D. 2016. “Grand Master Challenge, the Game.” COS/TOUR/699493/DIVERTIMENTO, COSME Programme 2014–2020, ISBN 9788890859267. Cupertino: Apple.
  23. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2017. “The United States of Europe. Dress Rehearsal: Rhodes 1306–1522.” In EUROTHENTICA. Cupertino: Apple, ISBN 9788890859267.
  24. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., Weiss-Ibanez, D., and Di Russo, A. 2017. “The Gamification of Heritage in the UNESCO-Listed Medieval City of Rhodes.” In 1st International GAMEFIN Conference, edited by P. Tuomi and A. Pertula, 60–70. Pori, Finland: Tampere University of Technology, TUT Game Lab.
  25. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2022. “Intensive Composite Training in Gamification to Rewind the Tourism Service Design.” Heritage4Growth, 2021-1-RO01-KA220-VET-000033109, Erasmus+ Programme.
  26. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2022. “Grand Master Challenge, the Game.” 2021-1-RO01-KA220-VET-000033109, Heritage4Growth.
  27. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., and Cinar, K. 2023. “Developing a Prototype for Serious Games at Places of Cultural Significance: Evidence from UNESCO-Listed Heritage in Greece and Turkey.” In HERiPRENEURSHIP. Sustainable Tourism, Heritage Management and the Cultural and Creative Industries: Creating New Investment Opportunities at Places of Cultural Significance, 197–208. Editura Mega, ISBN 978-606-020-654-5.
  28. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., and Weiss-Ibanez, D.-F. A. 2023. Heritage4Growth, 2021-1-RO01-KA220-VET-000033109, Erasmus+ Programme 2021–2027, ARTIFACTORY, Chios.
  29. Phillips, S. “The Hospitallers’ Aegean Empire in the Late Fifteenth Century: The Contribution of Cyprus in the Struggle for Supremacy.” In The Struggle for Supremacy: The Mediterranean World in 1453 and Beyond, edited by George Cassar, Dane Munro, and Noel Buttigieg, 23–30. Valletta: Sacra Militia Foundation, 2019.
  30. Sablier, E. Le Prisonnier de Bourganeuf: Djem Sultan, 1459–1495. Paris: Perrin, 2000.
  31. Setton, Kenneth M. The Papacy and the Levant (1204–1571), Vol. II: The Fifteenth Century. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1978. Chapter 13, “Innocent VIII, Jem Sultan, and the Crusade (1484–1490).”
  32. Soldani, Maria Elisa, and Daniel Duran i Duelt. “Religion, Warfare and Business in Fifteenth-Century Rhodes.” In Religione e istituzioni religiose nell’economia europea, 1000–1800 / Religion and Religious Institutions in the European Economy, 1000–1800, edited by Francesco Ammannati, 257–270. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2012.
  33. Thuasne, Louis. Djem-Sultan, fils de Mohammed II, frère de Bayezid II, 1459–1495. Paris, 1892.
  34. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Medieval City of Rhodes.” World Heritage List, ref. 493. Inscribed 1988. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/493.
  35. Vatin, Nicolas. L’Ordre de Saint-Jean-de-Jérusalem, l’Empire ottoman et la Méditerranée orientale entre les deux sièges de Rhodes, 1480–1522. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 1994.
  36. Vertot, René Aubert, Abbé de. The History of the Knights Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem, Called Afterwards the Knights of Rhodes, and at Present the Knights of Malta. 5 vols. London, 1757.
  37. Zoitou, S. “The Hospitallers’ Institutions.” Chapter in a 2021 study of the Collachium of Rhodes (accessed via JSTOR). Principal modern source for the building’s identification, siting, arms evidence and construction phases, and for the “three successive hospitals” framework used throughout this Statement.
Erasmus+ KA220-HED REBOOT 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980
Created by CULTiNVEST