REBOOT ● Erasmus+ KA220-HEDProject No. 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980 From the SoS to Validated NarrativesWP3_T3.2.2 AI-assisted Content Design TrainingWP3_T3.2.4 Development of Stories

UNESCO-listed Medieval City of Rhodes · the central harbour, immediately south-east of Mandraki

The Commercial Harbour of the Knights Hospitallers

The great central harbour of Rhodes town — the Order’s port of arrival for merchants, pilgrims and dignitaries between 1309 and 1522 — enclosed by its sea wall, entered through the sea-wall gates and the monumental Sea Gate of Grand Master d’Aubusson, and today the town’s ferry and excursion-boat harbour.

“to become the most significant point of reference, the symbol of a naval city” Manoussou-Della on d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate

Exceptional / Very High High Medium
00
Identity

The Great Harbour

The central harbour of Rhodes town › the Order’s gateway for trade, pilgrims and dignitaries

Site name
The Commercial Harbour of the Knights Hospitallers; today Rhodes’ working commercial, passenger and ferry harbour (locally also called Kolona).
Location & setting
The central and largest of the historic harbours of Rhodes town, immediately south-east of Mandraki (the Knights’ war-galley harbour, documented separately in this series) and separated from it by the mole popularly known as the Mole of the Windmills. Coordinates (approximate, harbour basin) 36°26′57″ N, 28°13′50″ E; 0 m at the basin and quays, rising to a few metres along the town’s sea-front fortification walk. It is distinct from the much larger modern Akandia container and cruise port further south-east, which lies outside the medieval fortified circuit described here.
Type
A fortified commercial and merchant harbour of the Knights Hospitaller — flanking towers, a chain closure attributed to Grand Master Naillac, sea-wall gates and a monumental sea gate — in continuous use as a working harbour to the present day. Unit of recording: open space.
Construction history
Earliest outer-wall extension under Hélion de Villeneuve (1319–1346); fortification of the harbour front begun under Dieudonné de Gozon (1346–1353); the Tower of Naillac and its chain mechanism under Philibert de Naillac (1396–1421), extended under Antoni Fluvian (1421–1437); St Catherine’s Gate named by 1465 and repaired under Giovanni Battista degli Orsini (1467–1476); major reconstruction and the monumental Sea Gate (1478/1487) under Pierre d’Aubusson (1476–1503); the Tower of Naillac seriously damaged by the earthquake and gunpowder explosion of 1856 and entirely demolished by 1863; Italian-era restoration and new vehicular gates, 1912–1947.
Heritage designation
Component of the “Medieval City of Rhodes” UNESCO World Heritage property (ref. 493, inscribed 1988, criteria ii, iv, v); protected under Greek Archaeological Law 3028/2002, confirming Ministerial Decision 23084/737 of 1948.
Present use
Working commercial, passenger and ferry harbour, administered by the Hellenic Republic since 1948; the surrounding fortifications are administered by the Ephorate of Antiquities of the Dodecanese.
Administration
Hellenic Republic, Ministry of Culture (harbour-front fortifications: Tower of France/the Angel (identification unsettled), Marine Gate, Gate of St Paul, St Catherine’s Gate), through the Ephorate of Antiquities of the Dodecanese; Municipal Port Fund of Rhodes (harbour basin, quays and moorings).
Functions through time
Fortified commercial harbour of the Knights Hospitaller, 1309–1522; Ottoman commercial harbour and anchorage, 1522–1912; Italian administration of the Dodecanese, 1912–1947; commercial, passenger and ferry harbour (Hellenic Republic), 1948 to the present.
01
Architecture

The Harbour of Merchants

Sea wall, gates, the Sea Gate and a lost tower › a fortified commercial front: one tower lost, one still disputed

The harbour basin
A roughly rectangular basin enclosed on its landward side by the medieval sea wall — running from the bastion below the Palace of the Grand Master, past the Marine Gate and the Gate of St Paul, to the Arsenal (Tarsanas) area — and on its seaward side by the Mole of the Windmills with the (now vanished) Tower of Naillac at its tip. The restoration literature calls it one of the “two most important among [the town’s] five harbours” (Della/Dellas, p. 114).
St Catherine’s Gate (the Gate of the Mole)
At the north-west corner, the medieval “Gate of the Mole,” known as St Catherine’s Gate by 1465 and named for the nearby Hospice of St Catherine (founded 1391–92 under Heredia), leads from the town onto the mole and its windmills, linking this harbour physically to Mandraki. The project’s web sources call the same crossing, or one beside it, the “Gate of the Mills”; the academic literature consulted uses only the name St Catherine’s Gate/Gate of the Mole.
The vanished Tower of Naillac
Built by Philibert de Naillac (1396–1421) at the eastern tip of the Mole of the Windmills: a great octagonal tower, in Manoussou-Della’s words “the main symbol of the bustling and cosmopolitan commercial harbour of the city,” and during Ottoman rule “the tower of the knights” (Manoussou-Della, Commercial Port, p. 193); about 46 m high according to the 19th-century travellers cited in the companion Mandraki Statement. It is credited in part to his predecessor Heredia, whose marble coat of arms the traveller Belabre saw in secondary use on an upper storey. The sources record the arms of the Order and of Pierre Culant at wall-walk level, Naillac’s own above the second-floor entrance, Fluvian’s arms on the mole’s north façade (a further phase) and a reconstruction of the front under Orsini (1467–1476). The tower itself no longer stands: seriously damaged by the earthquake and gunpowder explosion of 1856, it was entirely demolished by 1863 (see History and Eyewitness, and the Mandraki Statement).
The Tower of France, or the Angel — a flagged identification
The project’s web sources (Wikipedia, “Fortifications of Rhodes”; viagallica.com) describe a second tower on the harbour’s landward side, built by d’Aubusson and named for the French royal arms once displayed on it; also called the Tower of the Angel and, in some popular renderings, the Tower of St Angelo or the Tower of the Mills. No academic architectural or restoration source consulted — including Manoussou-Della’s dedicated chapter on this harbour, read in full — names or corroborates such a tower, so the identification rests on those web sources alone and should be treated accordingly pending verification.
The harbour-mouth chain
Manoussou-Della’s dedicated chapter corroborates a chain across the harbour mouth: its fixed end set into the terminus of the Mole of the Windmills, its control mechanism installed at the base of the Tower of Naillac, a modification attributed “with great certainty” to Naillac himself (pp. 193–194; archaeological drawing of the chain aperture, fig. 63). The same source suggests, more tentatively, that an earlier, narrower Byzantine-era arrangement of towers and a chain may already have controlled the entrance. What is not confirmed is the chain’s opposite, landward anchor point, which the chapter does not attribute to any “Tower of France.” This is a separate installation from the chain documented, and archaeologically confirmed in 2006, at Mandraki.
The Marine Gate and its Byzantine towers
Beside d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate, the Marine Gate gives the town’s other principal access onto “the central Medieval harbour” (Della/Dellas, p. 140). It is flanked by two reused Byzantine towers, one converted into a chapel of St George in Hospitaller times (Manoussou-Della 1997, p. 600) — a rare instance of pre-Hospitaller fabric surviving in direct structural use within the Order’s harbour-front defences.
The Gate of St Paul
Described as functioning as much as a “bulwark” as a passage, opening onto the small square of the Arsenal, the “Neorion” (Manoussou-Della 1997, p. 600). The surviving polygonal structure postdates an earlier gate on or near the site, of “indeterminable relation” to a “Gate of St Nicholas” cited in older literature; its builder and date are not established in the sources consulted.
The Tarsanas (Arsenal) Gate
Of 14th-century origin and associated with Heredia’s era (1377–1396), it gave the wide, 9-metre-plus passage needed to move ships’ components to and from the Order’s shipyard; its flanking towers were demolished in 1909, and the Italian administration later opened a further vehicular Tarsana gate and the Gate of Liberty. “Tarsanas” descends from the same Arabic/Italian root (dar al-sina’a, “house of manufacture”) as the Order’s darsana, already attested at Acre in the 13th century (Jacoby, pp. 57, 61).
D’Aubusson’s Sea Gate, 1478/1487
The most monumental structure on the town front, completed in 1478 and inscribed in 1487, conceived “to become the most significant point of reference, the symbol of a naval city” (Manoussou-Della, pp. 234–235). Its marble portal carries reliefs of the Virgin and Child, St John the Baptist and St Peter, flanked by the shields of the Order and of d’Aubusson, and a Latin inscription naming him “de Turcis inclitus victor” — a dated architectural answer to the Great Siege of 1480. Manoussou-Della compares its design to the gate of the Fort of St André at Villeneuve-lès-Avignon, pointing to direct Western European influence. Restored under the Italian administration, it remains in place and in use.
Materials and technique
Coursed local stone throughout, with the Order’s successive campaigns legible in surviving coats of arms — Fluvian’s on the Tower of Naillac’s mole, d’Aubusson’s repeatedly on the Sea Gate and elsewhere. Three traditions share one perimeter: harbour engineering (mole, quays, chain closure), military architecture (the lost Tower of Naillac, the Marine Gate’s Byzantine towers, the St Paul bulwark) and monumental ceremonial architecture (the Sea Gate), a mixture characteristic of a commercial port that was also a front line.
Commerce, customs and defence
The harbour’s defining role was as Rhodes’ working merchant port, distinct from Mandraki’s closed war-galley base, though the Order’s galleys and light craft are also recorded using it. A customs bailiwick, the “bailliage du commerce” (attested from 1358 as the “Commercium,” with named bailiffs such as Diomède de Villaragut from 1470), levied port dues alongside a wine gabella and a flour-weighing gabella; a 1521 breakdown records gabella and “dretti” duties totalling some 22,000 Rhodian florins in one year; and a 1464 assembly added a 1% customs surcharge to fund fortification work. The Order also minted its own coinage from the 1330s. Even in wartime the Hospitallers on occasion gave safe conduct to Ottoman merchants travelling west (Mercieca).
A heritage landscape in daily use
Today the basin remains, without a break in essential function, a working commercial, passenger and ferry harbour — a rare case of a medieval merchant port still substantially doing the job it was built for. Modern harbour installations and a ring road have left the historic “passage” between St Catherine’s Gate and the mole “presently dispersed” (Della/Dellas, p. 145), but the Sea Gate, the Marine Gate and St Catherine’s Gate remain in place and on view; the Tower of Naillac, lost in the 19th century, does not.
02
History

From the Colossus Harbour to the Ferry Quay

Antiquity to today › Hellenistic, Hospitaller, Ottoman, Italian and Greek

Before 1309: one of three ancient harbours
Rhodes town’s harbours occupy the shoreline used since antiquity; this one, with Mandraki and the harbour of Akantia, is one of three ancient harbours around which the town’s Castille, Gallia and Italy Langue sectors developed. The Order’s own naval identity was taking shape just before the conquest: its office of Admiral is first attested in its legislation in 1299, and its growing fleet, aided by a Genoese fleet, invaded Rhodes in 1306 and completed the conquest by 1310 (Bronstein 2019, p. 83).
1309–1346: Villeneuve’s outer wall
A document of 5 November 1309 already records a commercial transaction “on the mole.” Hélion de Villeneuve (1319–1346) extended an intermediate outer wall (proteichisma) southward, with a double-faced gate onto both the harbour quay and the great public square, the “platea” — the earliest in-situ Hospitaller construction identified on this front. In 1342 the Byzantine historian Nikephoros Gregoras recorded that his friend Manuel Angelos found at Rhodes “a good harbour and Tarsana that receive merchants from all parts.”
1346–1353: de Gozon begins the fortification
A contemporary chronicle records that Dieudonné de Gozon “built the mole and closed off from the sea the bourgo of Rhodes.” Manoussou-Della concludes that he completed the first circumvallation of the harbour front up to the mole gate and built the western front of the Mole of the Windmills, intersecting an earlier, undated and much wider wall that appears to have closed a narrower, pre-Hospitaller mouth.
1377–1396: Heredia
The Hospice of St Catherine was founded in 1391–92 near the walls and the Gate leading to the mole, and the Tarsanas Gate is attributed to his era. Heredia’s reign also saw the first significant Hospitaller towers on the harbour quay, including two protecting the Byzantine sea gate and, on Manoussou-Della’s account, the massive harbour-centre tower later known as the Tower of Naillac. The Customs House, the “Commerkion,” stood at the southern corner of a widening of the sea wall that also defined the great public square.
1396–1437: Naillac and Fluvian
Naillac built the octagonal Tower of Naillac and, “with great certainty,” fitted the chain’s fixed end at the Mole of the Windmills and its control mechanism at the tower’s base, at the end of the 14th or beginning of the 15th century. Fluvian added a further phase on the mole’s north façade and is credited with the gate west of Naillac’s mole linking this harbour to Mandraki and the mole of St Nicholas.
1458: a pilgrim galley arrives
Roberto da Sanseverino’s galley approaches Rhodes on 10 June 1458 (see Eyewitness, section 03).
1465–1476: Orsini repairs the front
By 1465 the “Gate of the Mole” was known as St Catherine’s Gate. Giovanni Battista degli Orsini repaired it and “the whole sea wall” as far west as the Commerkion; Bosio records that in 1472 he undertook to build “one hundred canne” of sea-side wall at his own expense, with the future Grand Master d’Aubusson, then Captain of the city of Rhodes, as inspector of works.
1475–1480: collapse, flood and siege
A major collapse of the early Byzantine sea front began in December 1475 and was worsened by the flood of 1476, after which the harbour front was rebuilt somewhat further east. The Ottoman siege of 1480, in which this front was a principal line of defence, followed.
1476–1503: d’Aubusson’s campaign
Described as “a homo universalis, who first introduced early Renaissance features in the architecture of Rhodes” (Della/Dellas, p. 132), d’Aubusson radically reconstructed the Tower of Naillac’s mole; built, per the web sources, the Tower of France/the Angel; raised the Sea Gate (completed 1478, inscribed 1487); and built a new north-facing gate near the old quay after the “tower of the old Hospital” had collapsed and vanished. A portal bearing his arms as Cardinal, dated 1494, suggests further reconstruction of the Tarsana gate area after siege damage, an earthquake and a tidal wave.
2005–2010: excavations at the Tarsana gate
Excavations in 2005–2006 and again in 2010 uncovered an older, narrower predecessor tower, consistent with a possible earlier, Byzantine-era arrangement of towers and chain at the harbour mouth.
1522–1912: the Ottoman anchorage
After the Order’s surrender of Rhodes to Suleiman the Magnificent in 1522 the harbour continued in use as the town’s working anchorage, without the intensive building programme of the Hospitaller centuries.
1856–1863: the Tower of Naillac lost
The earthquake of 12 October 1856 and the gunpowder-magazine explosion of 6 November 1856 seriously damaged the Tower of Naillac; already structurally weakened, it was entirely demolished, or simply collapsed, and disappeared by 1863, a loss counted among the most regretted in the medieval town’s history. The same loss is documented in the companion Mandraki Statement, which cites an Illustrated London News sketch of 16 December 1856 showing the tower’s partial collapse.
1909 and 1912–1947: demolition and Italian works
The towers of the Tarsanas Gate were demolished in 1909. Italy occupied the Dodecanese from 1912 and restored the harbour-front monuments, including the Sea Gate and the surrounding bastion, and opened the Gate of Liberty and a Tarsana gate to carry traffic between Mandraki and this harbour.
1948 to today: a working harbour
Following the 1947 Treaty of Peace with Italy and the Dodecanese’s transfer to Greece, effective in 1948, the harbour has continued as Rhodes’ main commercial, passenger and ferry harbour, within the UNESCO-inscribed Medieval City of Rhodes (1988).
03
Testimony

EYEWITNESS

Archives, travellers and scholars › what each witness shows, reported as reported

A Byzantine visitor, 1342

In 1342, the Byzantine historian Nikephoros Gregoras recorded that his friend Manuel Angelos found at Rhodes “a good harbour and Tarsana that receive merchants from all parts” — a rare outside eyewitness confirmation that the harbour and its shipyard were already working as a commercial port within a generation of the Hospitaller conquest.

Manoussou-Della, Commercial Port, pp. 190–191, citing A. Luttrell, The Town, pp. 219–221; not independently consulted for this page.
A pilgrim arrives, 1458

Approaching Rhodes on the morning of 10 June 1458, the pilgrim galley of the Milanese condottiere Roberto da Sanseverino was chased for some six hours by an armed Genoese ship in the roadstead, whose plague-stricken crew had mistaken it for a hostile vessel; the matter ended when the galley displayed the banner of the Patriarch of Aquileia, then papal legate at Rhodes. The party lodged at the House of St Catherine, then at the Italian Langue’s auberge, and was received by a Grand Master “sick in bed with the gout,” consistent with Jacques de Milly. His diary does not say which harbour received the galley; because Mandraki was the closed war-galley base, this project treats this harbour as the far more probable point of arrival for a civilian pilgrim vessel.

Vidoni, pp. 236–240, 345–347 (1993 English translation); Maruffi ed., pp. 52–61 (1888, a related but textually distinct manuscript tradition). Neither verified against the original manuscripts for this document; the choice of harbour is this project’s inference.
The Sea Gate, in its own words

Carved in marble on the Sea Gate, the Latin inscription of 1487 names Pierre d’Aubusson “de Turcis inclitus victor,” the renowned victor over the Turks, and the portal’s reliefs show the Virgin and Child, St John the Baptist and St Peter, flanked by the shields of the Order and of d’Aubusson. Manoussou-Della reads the gate as conceived “to become the most significant point of reference, the symbol of a naval city.”

Manoussou-Della, pp. 234–237; the inscription and reliefs were not independently examined for this page.
The chain: what the academic source confirms, and what it does not

Earlier drafts of this document flagged the Commercial Harbour’s chain as resting on web sources alone; that flag is now reversed for the chain itself. Manoussou-Della’s dedicated chapter independently corroborates it: fixed end at the terminus of the Mole of the Windmills, control mechanism at the base of the Tower of Naillac, attributed “with great certainty” to Naillac himself. What remains uncorroborated is only the chain’s opposite, landward anchor point, which the chapter does not attribute to any “Tower of France” or “Tower of St Angelo.”

Manoussou-Della, Commercial Port, pp. 193–194, 186, 199–201 (fig. 63); viagallica.com (“his entrance was sometimes closed by a huge chain connecting the rocky peaks”). The separate Mandraki chain is documented in the companion Statement.
The Tower of France or the Angel: a flag, not a finding

The Wikipedia and viagallica.com pages describe a second tower on the harbour’s landward side, but no academic architectural or restoration source consulted names it. The user also supplied a paper titled “Maritime Caravans and the Knights of St John”; read directly for this project, it proved to be Simon Mercieca’s chapter on the Order’s 16th–18th-century Malta-period caravan cruises, in which “St Angelo” denotes the unrelated Fort St Angelo at Birgu, and it mentions no Rhodian tower or harbour chain. A further supplied source, the Warfare History Network’s “The Sieges of Rhodes,” returned a 403 error and could not be retrieved.

Wikipedia, “Fortifications of Rhodes”; viagallica.com; Mercieca (2010), ch. 8; Warfare History Network. The identification is reported as it stands, not endorsed.
Michael of Rhodes: a working assumption

Michael of Rhodes, who names himself “Michalli da Ruodo,” was Rhodian-born; according to Alan Stahl, he enrolled in the Venetian merchant marine at Manfredonia in 1401 at about sixteen, and compiled between 1434 and 1445 a manuscript of mathematics, navigation and shipbuilding. This project adopts, as its own working assumption rather than as fact, that he left Rhodes by this harbour, estranged from his mother. The Michael of Rhodes Project states plainly that nothing is known of his background or reasons for leaving, and no source examined mentions his mother.

Arbel, Mediterranean Historical Review 29:2 (2014), pp. 186–194, reporting Stahl; Michael of Rhodes Project, “Michael’s Life.” The framing is this project’s, not attested biography.
The Tower of Naillac: 1856–1863

This project adopts the account given in the companion Mandraki Statement: the Tower of Naillac was seriously damaged by the earthquake and explosion of 1856 and entirely demolished by 1863, and survives only in images, descriptions and an unexcavated footprint near the modern lighthouse mole. The Illustrated London News sketch of 16 December 1856 is cited there and was not examined for this page. Manoussou-Della’s Commercial Port chapter, as summarised in the source Statement for this harbour, instead reports damage in an 1851 earthquake and a repair “to its present form” photographed in May 1852; that account has not been carried forward on this page and should be checked against the chapter itself.

Mandraki Statement of Significance in this series (Illustrated London News, 16 December 1856, as cited there); Manoussou-Della, Commercial Port, pp. 192–193 (not followed on this point).
04
Narrative

Door to the World

Told by Niko, a customs runner › from the quay at dawn to the open doors of the Sea Gate

The Harbour Never Sleeps

My name is Niko, the Greek. I am the runner for the clerk of the customs house, which means I am allowed to be everywhere in the Great Harbour, all day long, and nobody tells me to go home. Everyday I walk along the long Mole of the Windmills, beside the Tower of Naillac. From here I can see everything. Behind me, the sea. In front of me, the whole harbour: a wide basin ringed by the town wall, with its gates, its towers and its sea-front busy as an anthill. At the foot of this tower, in a room I am not allowed to enter, there is a winch that can pull a huge iron chain across the harbor mouth if enemies ever come. The Knights of Saint John do not forget that Rhodes is a fortress.

Everyday busy ships enter the harbor! A Venetian galley with her tall flag. A round Genoese merchantman, fat as a pumpkin. A little Greek boat from the islands, low in the water under her sacks. Next to them, a sleek ship from Egypt. And, and the vessels of the great Turks. The Knights are the boldest sailors of the Christian world, and the Great Harbour is their front door. Over the door, on the grand marble Sea Gate that Grand Master d’Aubusson built, the Virgin and Child look down on every ship that arrives. It is the symbol of our naval city.

Told in the voice of Niko, an invented runner: supplied by the user for this document. The setting is documented — the Mole of the Windmills, the Tower of Naillac, the chain mechanism at the tower’s base (Architecture, Eyewitness) and the Sea Gate’s Virgin and Child (Architecture) — but Niko, his errands and what he sees from the mole are narrative devices.
Everything in the World

Now follow me down to the quay, and I will show you what a ship can carry. Pepper, so fragrant that it makes you sneeze three feet away. Caviar in little barrels, from the far northern seas. Perfumes in tiny glass bottles, worth more than their weight in silver. Fabrics in every colour, silk from the East, wool from the West. Carpets rolled up like sleeping giants. Jars of olive oil, barrels of wine, loaves of sugar wrapped in blue paper, blocks of soap. Spices of every kind: ginger, cinnamon, cloves.

And people. I must tell you about that too, because a harbour tells the whole truth. In these years, among the merchandise that comes through the port are slaves, men and women who have been captured and are bought and sold like sacks of pepper. It is the worst thing I see here, and I try not to look too long. The Order has rules about it, at least. Every slave brought into Rhodes must be registered at the customs house within three days. The clerk checks where the person came from, and he must be sure that the enslaving was lawful under the Order’s own statutes. No Christian may keep another Christian as a slave. These rules are written down, and I carry the papers. But when I think about the faces of the people in the line, I do not feel that rules are enough.

Told in Niko’s voice: supplied by the user for this document. The cargoes listed are the narrator’s picture of the trade; this page documents the harbour’s commercial role and customs machinery (Architecture) but does not itemise goods. The slave-registration rule comes from the project’s research note on Hospitaller economics, not reproduced on this page; it is stated by the narrator, and the human cost is the narrator’s own reflection.
The House of the Commerchium

Master Bartolomeo, the clerk, sits at his tall desk in the customs house, which the Knights call the Commerchium. It stands at the corner of the great public square, so close to the harbour that you can smell the tar through the window. Every ship that comes to Rhodes passes through his hands. The goods are counted. The dues are written down. The gold is weighed. My job is to run, with a message, a measure, a stamp, a basket of wax. Why do merchants pay? Master Bartolomeo explains it patiently, as if I were his own grandson. Every cargo that comes through the port pays a small duty to the Order, and in return the Order keeps the sea road safe. The duty on wine, for instance, was once given to the highest bidder, on the condition that he also paid to keep a guard-galley at sea. So the wine drinker, the wine merchant and the galley are all part of one big machine.

When my grandfather was young, the people of Rhodes met in this very house and agreed to add a small extra tax to the harbour dues, one part in a hundred, to pay for the walls. Think of it! A tiny coin for every barrel, and the walls rose stone by stone. Add up all the harbour and market duties, says Master Bartolomeo, and in a good year they come to well over twenty thousand florins. “A harbour is a purse,” he likes to say, “that fills itself, if you keep it safe.” There is a separate duty for merchants who are not Christians, Muslim or Jewish traders, and I confess I do not understand why they pay more. Master Bartolomeo only shrugs. “It is the rule,” he says. “But they pay it, and they come back. That is what matters to Rhodes.”

Told in Niko’s voice: supplied by the user for this document. Master Bartolomeo is an invented clerk. The customs house (the “Commerkion”), the 1464 one-per-cent surcharge for fortification and the roughly 22,000-florin annual total of 1521 are documented on this page (Architecture, History); the wine-duty arrangement and the separate duty on non-Christian merchants come from the project’s research note on Hospitaller economics, not reproduced here.
Friends and Enemies

The Knights of Saint John and the Turks are deadly enemies. Every child in Rhodes knows the story of the Great Siege of 1480, when the Sultan’s army tried to take our island and failed. Over the Sea Gate, in marble, the Grand Master is called the famous victor over the Turks. And yet, if you look at the quay this very morning, you will see a Turkish merchant named Mehmed counting his bales of cloth beside a Rhodian trader named Giorgios, the two of them arguing about the price of dried figs as cheerfully as two old neighbours. Master Bartolomeo explains it to me one slow afternoon. “Niko,” he says, “an enemy at war is a different thing from a customer at the counter. When our grandfathers made peace with the old Sultan Bayezid, the treaty promised our merchants freedom of trade in his lands, paying only the usual tolls. Grand Master d’Aubusson wrote to the Pope that Rhodes gained great advantages from it. Sometimes we give a safe-conduct to an Ottoman merchant, so that he can pass through to the West. The Order may fight the Sultan’s army, but the Order also likes the Sultan’s customers.” I think about that a lot. Two men can be enemies at the walls and partners at the quay, and the strange thing is that neither of them is lying. Each wants to be safe, and each wants to be rich, and the harbour is the place where the two wishes meet. This year there is even better news. The Grand Master has signed a twelve-point treaty with the Sultan of Egypt. The merchants of both sides may trade in peace, and the ships of neither may attack the ships of the other. The whole quay was buzzing about it for a week.

Told in Niko’s voice: supplied by the user for this document. Mehmed and Giorgios are invented. The Sea Gate’s inscription naming d’Aubusson “de Turcis inclitus victor” (Eyewitness) and the safe conduct sometimes given to Ottoman merchants (Architecture) are documented here; the treaty with Sultan Bayezid and the twelve-point treaty with the Sultan of Egypt come from the project’s research note on Hospitaller economics, not reproduced on this page.
Where the Gold Goes

In the evening, when the great lamps are lit on the quay, I like to walk past the Arsenal, which we call the Tarsanas. The gate there is very wide, wide enough for a cart to carry a mast. Behind it the Order’s shipwrights build and mend galleys with a clatter and a smell of pitch that I love. Much of the gold that comes through the Commerchium ends up right here, in oak planks, ropes and sails. The Order’s ships are not only for guarding the harbour, though. Sometimes the galleys of the Knights capture merchant ships of the Order’s enemies at sea, and their cargo is brought home as prize. Just a few years ago, they say, a great ship was taken that was carrying spices, cloth and carpets from Alexandria. Some of the pepper was set aside to ransom the merchants who had been aboard. I find that thought a strange one: the same pepper that I smell on the quay might once have bought a man his freedom. The Knights do not make money only by fighting, of course. They make it by weighing, counting, taxing and trading, and by being a place where everybody is welcome as long as they follow the rules and pay their dues. That is the real power of Rhodes. Our walls are strong, but our welcome is stronger.

Told in Niko’s voice: supplied by the user for this document. The Tarsanas Gate’s 9-metre-plus passage for ships’ components is documented (Architecture); the prize ship from Alexandria and the ransoming with its pepper are narrative drawn from the project’s research note on the Order’s prize economy, not reproduced or independently verified on this page.
Open Doors

Night falls over the Great Harbour. The ships rock gently. The last carpet has been rolled, the last barrel stamped, the last coin counted, and Master Bartolomeo puts the keys into his belt with a sigh. I walk back out onto the mole and look up at the Tower of Naillac. The chain is silent in its stone, as it has been for years, and I hope it will stay silent for years more. A chain is a good thing to have, but it is a better thing not to need. Because this is what I have learned in my little life. A fortress shuts the world out. A harbour lets it in. Rhodes is a small island, but in this harbour it is as large as the sea, because every ship that comes here brings a piece of somewhere else: a scent, a colour, a language, a story. The Knights built walls to keep Rhodes safe, but they kept the great door open to the water, making Rhodes very rich rich.

Told in Niko’s voice: supplied by the user for this document, as the story’s closing reflection. The tower and its chain are documented (Architecture, Eyewitness), though the tower itself was lost in the 19th century; the night scene and Niko’s conclusion are the narrator’s.
05
Gallery

Photo Gallery

Twelve views › manuscript illuminations, a portolan chart, the quays and walls today; images supplied by the user

06
Assessment

Significance Criteria

Nine-criteria framework › International importance

Rarity
A working medieval commercial harbour still enclosed by its medieval sea wall, sea-wall gates and a monumental ceremonial sea gate is a rare survival among Mediterranean ports; the combination on one harbour front of purely military architecture (the reused Byzantine towers of the Marine Gate, the St Paul bulwark), utilitarian harbour engineering (the Tarsanas Gate’s wide ship-component passage) and monumental representational architecture (d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate) is unusual within a single fortified perimeter.
High
Representativeness
Highly representative of the Order’s economic and commercial identity: unlike Mandraki, which embodies its naval and defensive function, the Palace of the Grand Master, its governmental authority, or the Great Hospital, its charitable vocation, the Commercial Harbour embodies its role as manager of a major trans-Mediterranean trading hub, completing the picture of the Order’s institutional identity on Rhodes.
Exceptional
Aesthetic value
D’Aubusson’s Sea Gate, with its marble portal, figural reliefs and heraldic shields, is among the most aesthetically significant single structures documented in this series; the wider harbour front, combining it with the Marine Gate, the Tower of Naillac’s site and the working modern harbour, remains one of the most photographed views of Rhodes.
High
Integrity
Assessed structure by structure. The Sea Gate, the Marine Gate and St Catherine’s Gate survive in place and substantially in use, retaining a high degree of authentic Hospitaller-period fabric. The Tower of Naillac, by contrast, is a total loss: seriously damaged in 1856 and entirely demolished by 1863, as recorded in the Mandraki Statement. The chain itself is independently corroborated by documents, but its control mechanism went with the tower; the open question is the survival, form and name of the reported second tower.
High · Mixed
Historical value
Outstanding, as the economic and maritime heart of the Order’s rule from 1309 to 1522 — attested in concrete fiscal terms by its customs bailiwick, gabellas and a dedicated 1464 fortification surcharge — a richly documented sequence of Grand Masters’ building campaigns culminating in d’Aubusson’s post-1480 reconstruction, the setting for a dated 1458 pilgrim’s account, and, on this project’s working assumption only, the possible point of departure of Michael of Rhodes.
Exceptional
Symbolic, spiritual & social value
As the harbour through which merchants, pilgrims and dignitaries first met the Order’s Rhodes, it carried strong symbolic value, made explicit in the inscription and iconography of the Sea Gate. Socially it remains one of the most vital, continuously used public spaces in Rhodes town, still performing substantially the function for which it was built.
High
Scientific value
The gates and towers offer research value for the typology and chronology of Hospitaller military and ceremonial architecture, comparable to French fortified-gate design at Villeneuve-lès-Avignon. The Naillac-era chain and the possible earlier Byzantine precursor suggested by the 2005–2010 excavations remain active subjects of research, and the unresolved identity of the reported second tower is a specific target for future archival and archaeological work.
High
Interpretive potential
Unusually rich: the Order’s economic and commercial history, a two-century sequence of named Grand Masters’ campaigns, the monumental symbolism of the Sea Gate, and — carefully flagged as a working assumption — the human story of Michael of Rhodes leaving the island as a teenager for a maritime career that produced one of the great surviving manuscripts of medieval navigation.
Exceptional
Importance level
International significance, as the economic and maritime heart of the Order’s rule over Rhodes and an integral component, alongside the Palace of the Grand Master, the Great Hospital and the Military Harbour (Mandraki), of the Outstanding Universal Value of the UNESCO-inscribed Medieval City of Rhodes under criteria (ii), (iv) and (v). The mixed integrity noted above should be carried forward into conservation and interpretive planning but does not diminish the overall level of significance.
International

Statement of significance

“to become the most significant point of reference, the symbol of a naval city” (Manoussou-Della on d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate.)

The Commercial Harbour of the Knights Hospitallers was the economic and maritime heart of the Order of St John’s rule over Rhodes from 1309 to 1522, the point of arrival and departure for the trans-Mediterranean shipping, merchant convoys, pilgrims and travellers on which the town’s economy depended, and functionally distinct from Mandraki, the enclosed war-galley harbour immediately beside it that is documented separately in this series.

From the early 14th century, successive Grand Masters — Hélion de Villeneuve, Dieudonné de Gozon, Juan Fernandez Heredia, Philibert de Naillac, Antoni Fluvian, Giovanni Battista degli Orsini and Pierre d’Aubusson — built and rebuilt the harbour’s outer wall and mole, the Tower of Naillac, the sea-wall gates (St Catherine’s, the Marine Gate, the Gate of St Paul, the Tarsanas Gate) and, finally, d’Aubusson’s monumental Sea Gate of 1478/1487, inscribed with his own victory over the Turks — a direct, dated architectural response to the Order’s successful defence of Rhodes in the Great Siege of 1480.

This project’s user-supplied web sources further describe a second flanking tower, the Tower of France or the Angel, on the harbour’s opposite side. A dedicated academic chapter on this harbour’s fortifications, obtained and read in full for this revision, independently corroborates the harbour-mouth chain itself — its fixed end at the Mole of the Windmills and its control mechanism at the base of the Tower of Naillac, attributed with great certainty to Grand Master Naillac — but, like the general architectural and restoration literature, does not itself name or otherwise corroborate the second, opposite tower under any of the names reported by the web sources. This document accordingly presents the chain as an academically corroborated Commercial Harbour feature, distinct from the separately and archaeologically confirmed chain at the adjoining Mandraki harbour, while continuing to flag the second tower’s identity as resting on the web sources alone.

The harbour’s significance also has a distinctively human dimension. This project adopts, as its own working assumption rather than as an attested fact, the possibility that Michael of Rhodes — a Rhodian-born mariner who enrolled in the Venetian merchant marine at about sixteen years of age in 1401 and went on to compile, between 1434 and 1445, one of the most important surviving manuscripts of medieval navigation, mathematics and shipbuilding — departed the island through this harbour. The authoritative modern edition of his manuscript states plainly that nothing is known of his family background or his precise reasons for leaving Rhodes, and this document presents the assumption accordingly, as an interpretive framing rather than as established history.

Following the Order’s surrender of Rhodes in 1522, the harbour continued in use under Ottoman and then Italian administration, and, since the 1948 transfer of the Dodecanese to Greece, has remained, without a break in essential function, Rhodes’ working commercial, passenger and ferry harbour — a rare case of a medieval merchant port still substantially doing the job it was built for. The Tower of Naillac, the harbour’s dominant landmark, was seriously damaged by the earthquake and gunpowder explosion of 1856 and entirely demolished by 1863. Taken together, this history gives the Commercial Harbour a monument of International importance: an integral component, alongside the Palace of the Grand Master, the Great Hospital of the Knights and the Military Harbour (Mandraki), of the Outstanding Universal Value of the UNESCO-inscribed Medieval City of Rhodes under criteria (ii), (iv) and (v).

National

ΥΑ 23084/737/25-8-1948 — ΦΕΚ 10/23-9-1948 (Ministerial Decision declaring the monuments of the Medieval Town of Rhodes, including the Commercial Harbour’s fortifications — the Marine Gate, the Gate of St Paul, the Tarsanas Gate, St Catherine’s Gate and d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate — protected under Greek Archaeological Law; subsequently confirmed under Law 3028/2002 on the Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in General).

UNESCO

World Heritage property: Medieval City of Rhodes (ref. 493), inscribed 1988. Criteria: (ii) the fortifications of Rhodes, built by the Order of St John, exerted a wide influence in the eastern Mediterranean; (iv) the Order’s Rhodian towns form an outstanding architectural ensemble illustrating a significant historical period; (v) the town is an important example of a traditional human settlement shaped by successive cultural layers and acculturation between Frankish, Ottoman and local Dodecanesian traditions. The Commercial Harbour’s surviving fortifications — the Tower of Naillac’s site, the Marine Gate, the Gate of St Paul, the Tarsanas Gate, St Catherine’s Gate and d’Aubusson’s Sea Gate — form part of the fortified circuit cited in the property’s Statement of Outstanding Universal Value, alongside the Palace of the Grand Master, the Great Hospital of the Knights and the Military Harbour (Mandraki).

References

  1. Arbel, Benjamin. Review of The Book of Michael of Rhodes. Mediterranean Historical Review 29, no. 2 (2014): 186–194.
  2. Bronstein, Judith. “The Hospitallers: From Land to Sea — An Examination of the Hospitallers’ Naval Activities in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries.” The Medieval History Journal 22, no. 1 (2019): 53–91.
  3. Della Dora, Veronica. Review of The Book of Michael of Rhodes. H-Net Reviews, March 2010.
  4. Della, A., and D. Dellas. Restoration works report on the Gate of Amboise and related Commercial Harbour-front fortifications (Tower of Naillac, Marine Gate, Gate of St Paul, Tarsanas Gate), in the compiled restoration-works volume for the Medieval Town of Rhodes, 2000–2008 (pagination as cited, pp. 79–147, 600). Full citation of the parent volume not fully captured in the working extract consulted; cited in the text as “Della/Dellas.”
  5. Hellenic Government Gazette (ΦΕΚ). Ministerial Decision 23084/737 (25 August 1948), ΦΕΚ 10 (23 September 1948), protection of the monuments of the Medieval Town of Rhodes; Law 3028/2002 on the Protection of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in General.
  6. ICOMOS Australia. The Burra Charter: The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Burwood: ICOMOS Australia, 2013.
  7. ICOMOS. ICOMOS Charter for the Interpretation and Presentation of Cultural Heritage Sites. Paris: ICOMOS, 2008.
  8. Jacoby, David. “Hospitaller Ships and Transportation across the Mediterranean.” Chapter 6 in The Hospitallers, the Mediterranean and Europe (pp. 57–72). Full editor, publisher and year not captured in the working extract consulted.
  9. Kollias, Elias. The Medieval Town of Rhodes and the Palace of the Grand Master. 2nd ed. Athens, 1994.
  10. Long, Pamela O., David McGee, and Alan M. Stahl, eds. The Book of Michael of Rhodes: A Fifteenth-Century Maritime Manuscript. 3 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.
  11. Manoussou-Della, K. “I. Detailed description of the fortified perimeter during the siege of 1480 — Ia. Sea section of the fortifications — Ia.1 The great commercial harbour of the town of Rhodes” (in Greek), pp. 184–202. A dedicated academic chapter on this harbour’s fortification history, including the harbour-mouth chain and the Tower of Naillac’s building and restoration history; no cover or title page was included in the 19-page extract consulted, so the parent chapter/volume’s full title, publisher and year are not independently confirmed here, and authorship is inferred with high confidence. Cited in the text as “Manoussou-Della, Commercial Port.”
  12. Manoussou-Della, K. “Morphological Elements of the Medieval Gates of the Town of Rhodes,” pp. 218–242. Full journal/volume title, publisher and year not fully captured in the working extract consulted; cited in the text as “Manoussou-Della.”
  13. Manoussou-Della, K. Conference paper on the fortifications and gates of Rhodes, 1997 (pagination as cited, pp. 596–600). Full title, venue and publisher not fully captured; cited in the text as “Manoussou-Della 1997.”
  14. Mercieca, Simon. “Maritime Caravans and the Knights of St John: Aspects of Mediterranean Seaborne Traffic (Sixteenth–Eighteenth Centuries).” Chapter 8 in Trade and Cultural Exchange in the Early Modern Mediterranean: Braudel’s Maritime Legacy, edited by Maria Fusaro, Colin Heywood, and Mohamed-Salah Omri, 158–175. London: Tauris Academic Studies. Originally cited by the user as a source for the harbour’s towers and chain; read directly and found to concern the Order’s later, Malta-period “caravan” institution rather than Rhodes’ harbour architecture, so it does not corroborate the Tower of Naillac, Tower of St Angelo/the Mills or Commercial Harbour chain identifications.
  15. Michael of Rhodes Project. “Michael’s Life.” Museo Galileo / Dibner Institute for the History of Science and Technology. Accessed 2026. http://brunelleschi.imss.fi.it/michaelofrhodes/.
  16. National Endowment for the Humanities. “Sailor of Fortune.” Humanities 31, no. 2 (March/April 2010).
  17. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. (2020). Historytelling: Designing Validated Heritage Narratives for Non-captive Audiences. Evidence from EU Funded Projects in the Programming Period 2014–2020. LUMEN Proceedings, 14, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.18662/lumproc/ibmage2020/02
  18. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2013. “SEE/B/0016/4.3/X SAGITTARIUS Record Sheet of the Great Hospital of The Knights in Rhodes.” Southeast Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme 2007–2013, Budapest.
  19. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2014. Statements of Significance. Principles, Methodology, Application for the Intensive Training Course of the Profession of Tourist Guides in the interpretation of heritage. Rhodes: Greek Ministry of Tourism / University of the Aegean, Vol. I 98 pages, Vol. II 82 pages.
  20. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2017. “The United States of Europe. dress rehearsal: Rhodes 1306–1522.” In EUROTHENTICA, Apple, Cupertino, ISBN 9788890859267.
  21. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2022. “Intensive Composite Training in Gamification to rewind the tourism service design.” Heritage4Growth, 2021-1-RO01-KA220-VET-000033109, Erasmus+ Programme.
  22. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. and Weiss-Ibanez, D. 2016. “Grand Master Challenge. the Game.” COS/TOUR/699493/DIVERTIMENTO, COSME Programme 2014–2020, ISBN 9788890859267, Apple, Cupertino.
  23. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D. 2021-1-RO01-KA220-VET-000033109 Heritage4Growth, Erasmus+ Programme 2021–2027, ARTIFACTORY, Chios.
  24. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., and Cinar, K. 2023. “Developing a prototype for serious games at places of cultural significance: evidence from UNESCO-listed heritage in Greece and Turkey.” In “HERiPRENEURSHIP. Sustainable Tourism, Heritage Management and the Cultural and Creative Industries: Creating New Investment Opportunities at Places of Cultural Significance,” EDITIURA MEGA, pp. 197–208, ISBN 978 606 020 654 5.
  25. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., Stavrinoudis, Th., Glyptou, K., and Skoultsos, S. 2013. “QR-RHODES: FROM THE TIME MACHINE TO THE QR CODE. Play Rooms for Non-Captive Audiences in the Age of Mobile Telephony. The Approach of the SEE TCP SAGITTARIUS 2011–2014.” In 5th International Scientific Conference “Tourism Trends and Advances in the 21st Century,” pp. 1–14.
  26. Papathanasiou-Zuhrt, D., Weiss-Ibanez, D., and Di Russo, A. 2017. The Gamification of Heritage in the UNESCO-Listed Medieval City of Rhodes. 1st International GAMEFIN Conference, Tuomi, P., and Pertula, A. (eds), Tampere University of Technology, TUT Game Lab, Finland, Pori, pp. 60–70.
  27. REBOOT internal research note, “Basic Knights Economics,” on the Order’s customs, responsions, banking, coinage and prize-economy arrangements at Rhodes; cited in the text as “this project’s research note on Hospitaller economics.”
  28. Sanseverino, Roberto da. Viaggio in Terra Santa fatto e descritto da Roberto da Sanseverino. Edited by Gioacchino Maruffi. Scelta di Curiosità Letterarie Inedite o Rare dal secolo XIII al XVII, dispensa CCXXIX. Bologna: Presso Romagnoli Dall’Acqua, 1888, pp. 52–61, 215–221. Cited in the text as “Maruffi ed.”; a related but textually distinct manuscript tradition from the one Vidoni translates, consulted via a project extract rather than the original edition.
  29. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. “Medieval City of Rhodes.” World Heritage List, ref. 493. Inscribed 1988. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/493.
  30. viagallica.com. Page on the fortifications and towers of the Rhodes Commercial Harbour (Tower St. Ange/Tower of the Angel and the harbour chain). Accessed 2026.
  31. Vidoni, Tullio. “The Journal of Roberto da Sanseverino (1417–1487): A Study on Navigation and Seafaring in the Fifteenth Century.” PhD dissertation, University of British Columbia, Department of History, May 1993. Includes, as Appendix A, Vidoni’s own English translation of the diary; cited in the text as “Vidoni.”
  32. Warfare History Network. “The Sieges of Rhodes.” Cited per the user’s supplied reference for the towers and chain of the Commercial Harbour; a fetch attempt to verify this source returned a 403 error and the page could not be retrieved for this document.
  33. Wikipedia. “Fortifications of Rhodes.” Accessed 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortifications_of_Rhodes.
Erasmus+ KA220-HED REBOOT 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980
Created by CULTiNVEST