REBOOT ● Erasmus+ KA220-HEDProject No. 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980 Statement of Significance · Pilot Cyprus RecordWP2_T2.3.5 Skills Blueprint for Generative AI

Pilot Cyprus Record · Asset REBOOT_CY06 · Lusignan Cyprus, Kyrenia, Cyprus

Kyrenia Castle

Kyrenia Castle is a monument of exceptional international significance for the history of fortification, maritime exchange and the layered cultural landscape of Cyprus. At the eastern edge of the historic harbour, it preserves the strategic relationship between sea route, port, town and the northern mountain corridor, and its fabric embodies repeated responses to political change and military technology from the Byzantine period through Lusignan, Venetian, Ottoman and British administration.

“Kyrenia Castle is a monument of exceptional international significance for the history of fortification, maritime exchange and the layered cultural landscape of Cyprus.” Central conclusion of the REBOOT_CY06 record

Exceptional High Moderate Low / Variable
00
Identity

Record, names & purpose

Eastern side of the historic harbour, Kyrenia › a harbour fortress, a protected monument and a museum complex

This statement assesses Kyrenia Castle as a fortified harbour, a layered work of military architecture and a museum setting of exceptional archaeological importance. Its significance lies not in a single period but in the legible interaction of Byzantine foundations, Lusignan rebuilding, Venetian artillery defence, Ottoman and British-period uses, and modern heritage presentation.

Preferred Name
Kyrenia Castle (Keryneia where appropriate in formal heritage references).
Historic Identity
Byzantine and Lusignan harbour fortress, transformed under Venetian rule.
Current Identity
Protected ancient monument, museum complex and harbour landmark.
Place
Eastern side of the historic harbour, Kyrenia, Cyprus.
Type
Harbour fortress; fortified residence; archaeological and maritime museum.
Periods
Byzantine, Lusignan, Venetian, Ottoman, British colonial and modern Cyprus.
Scope
Fortification, maritime landscape, sacred architecture, archaeology, conservation and interpretation.
Record Status
Pilot record for REBOOT learning design, prepared September 2026 and intended for review by the REBOOT team and relevant Cyprus heritage specialists before final public use.

The record follows the structure of the preceding REBOOT Cyprus statements. It separates fabric-based evidence from later tradition, distinguishes the medieval enclosure from the largely Venetian external profile, and connects conservation with source-critical generative-AI learning.

Naming and writing principles: use Kyrenia Castle as the preferred English name. Describe the castle as a phased monument, not simply as a Venetian or Crusader castle. Treat exact dates and builder attributions cautiously where archaeological and documentary evidence do not coincide. Describe the present political and management context factually and do not imply UNESCO World Heritage status.
01
Setting

A castle at the harbour mouth

North coast of Cyprus › sea defence, landing control, urban administration and long-distance communication in one compact landscape

The castle occupies the eastern edge of Kyrenia's historic harbour on the north coast of Cyprus. The monument cannot be understood apart from the enclosed harbour, the town, the coastal road and the Kyrenia mountain range. From the sea it presents a massive defensive profile; from within, the courtyard and surviving medieval ranges reveal a more complex residential, religious and logistical environment.

Harbour Entrance
Commanding position at the entrance to the old harbour.
Maritime Trade
Direct relationship with maritime trade, naval movement and coastal surveillance.
Views
Visual connection with Kyrenia town and the northern mountain chain.
Approach
Moat, bridge, harbour edge and approach routes as elements of the wider setting.

Strategic role in northern Cyprus

Kyrenia Castle formed the maritime counterpart to the mountain fortresses of Saint Hilarion, Buffavento and Kantara. Together these sites protected routes, communicated danger and supported the control of the northern coast and passes toward the Mesaoria. Its strategic value changed with military technology: medieval defence relied on walls, towers, archery, protected gates and the difficulty of assault; Venetian rebuilding responded to cannon fire with thicker, lower masses and rounded or polygonal artillery works.

Harbour & Anchorage
Harbour and anchorage control.
Refuge
Refuge for rulers, garrison and stores during conflict.
Mountain Castles
Connection between coastal defence and the mountain-castle network.
Presence
Administrative and symbolic presence at an important northern port.
02
History

Origins and building phases

Byzantine foundations to museum › dates and builder attributions are treated cautiously

The precise origin of the fortification remains incompletely understood. Published accounts commonly place a Byzantine stronghold here from the early medieval period, while reused material and the strategic harbour position point to a longer history of occupation. The domed church of Saint George, generally dated to the Byzantine period and later enclosed within the castle, is the clearest standing witness to the pre-Lusignan landscape. Interpretation should avoid assigning the entire surviving enclosure to this first phase.

Antiquity–early Middle Ages
Strategic harbour occupation; the form and extent of any earlier fortification remain uncertain.
c. 7th–11th centuries
Byzantine defensive phase and construction of the church of Saint George.
1191–1192
English conquest and transition to Lusignan rule.
c. 1208–1211
Major Lusignan enlargement traditionally associated with John of Ibelin.
13th–15th centuries
Repairs, residence, sieges and adaptation during Lusignan and Genoese conflicts.
1489–1570
Venetian rule; major artillery transformation, especially c. 1540–1544.
1570–1878
Ottoman military, administrative and storage use with repairs and alterations.
1878–20th century
British police, prison and military uses; archaeological recording and conservation.
1965–present
Discovery, excavation and museum display of the Kyrenia ship; continuing visitor use.

Early site and Byzantine fortress

Earlier Occupation
Possible late antique and early medieval occupation beneath later works.
Byzantine Fortification
Byzantine fortification commonly associated with the seventh to tenth centuries.
Saint George
Saint George as an important surviving pre-Lusignan building.
Loss & Concealment
Substantial loss or concealment caused by repeated rebuilding.
03
Fabric

Lusignan castle, church and daily life

Medieval enclosure within a Venetian shell › careful fabric analysis is essential

After the establishment of Lusignan rule, Kyrenia became a major royal fortress. The large medieval rebuilding traditionally associated with John of Ibelin in the early thirteenth century created a more formidable enclosure with a defended entrance, towers, arrow loops and internal accommodation. The north-east horseshoe-shaped tower and portions of the entrance, curtain walls and internal ranges preserve important evidence for this phase. Later Venetian work partly masked, demolished or absorbed the medieval castle.

Major Campaign
Major campaign conventionally dated c. 1208–1211.
Towers
Horseshoe-shaped and rectangular defensive towers.
Passages
Arrow loops, gate passages, vaulted rooms and wall walks.
Accommodation
Accommodation for garrison, administration and high-status residence.
Earlier Church
Integration of the earlier church within an expanded fortified perimeter.

Saint George of the Castle

The church of Saint George is a compact cross-in-square, domed building whose masonry and form preserve an exceptional Byzantine element inside the later fortress. Its survival makes religious practice visible within a site usually interpreted through warfare alone. Changes in floor level and the relationship between the church and surrounding walls record the castle's physical growth.

Plan
Cross-in-square plan and central dome.
Date
Byzantine fabric conventionally dated around the tenth or eleventh century.
Enclosure
Subsequent enclosure by Lusignan and Venetian fortifications.
Religious Traditions
Evidence for the coexistence and succession of religious traditions within the fortress.

Residence, garrison and administration

Kyrenia Castle was more than a defensive shell. Surviving halls, chambers, service spaces, stores and circulation routes show the requirements of residence and administration alongside those of a permanent or temporary garrison. Royal associations are historically important, but the term royal castle should not obscure the labour of soldiers, craftspeople, servants, prisoners, port workers and suppliers who sustained it.

Medieval Ranges
Residential and reception rooms in the medieval ranges.
Stores
Barracks, magazines, cisterns and food-storage areas.
Guard & Access
Guard rooms, defended circulation and controlled access.
Labour & Supply
Labour and supply links with town, hinterland and harbour.
04
Defence

Siege, artillery and the gate

Refuge, conflict and gunpowder engineering › a fortress as an instrument of negotiation as well as war

The castle repeatedly served as a refuge and bargaining point in conflicts involving Byzantine, English, Lusignan, imperial, Genoese, Venetian and Ottoman powers. Richard I's conquest of Cyprus in 1191 and the capture of members of Isaac Komnenos' household are central to the transition into Latin rule. Later thirteenth- and fourteenth-century struggles, including the Genoese crisis, led to repair, damage and renewed investment.

1191
Transition from Isaac Komnenos to the forces of Richard I.
Frederick II & the Ibelins
Role in the conflicts of Frederick II and the Ibelin regency.
Fourteenth Century
Dynastic and Genoese pressure.
Many Functions
Fortress as refuge, prison, treasury and strategic guarantee.

Venetian artillery transformation

Under Venetian rule the castle was radically transformed to resist gunpowder artillery. Work concentrated in the sixteenth century produced the massive exterior that defines its present image: thick ramparts, broad rounded towers, protected approaches and firing positions able to carry cannon. The rebuilding did not erase every medieval feature; it wrapped, cut through and reused earlier structures. This palimpsest is of exceptional value for studying the shift from high-medieval fortification to Mediterranean artillery defence.

Programme
Major programme substantially completed in the 1540s.
Corner Works
Massive north-west, south-west and south-east corner works.
Masonry
Low, thick masonry designed to absorb and return artillery fire.
Approach & Platforms
Reconfigured moat, entrance route, ramps and gun platforms.
Lusignan Survival
Partial survival of the Lusignan north-east tower and internal fabric.

Gate, moat and defensive circulation

The western entrance choreographs movement through bridge, moat, outer works, angled passages and guarded thresholds. Its layered construction makes the visitor route a primary source for understanding defensive design. Interpretation should distinguish between the medieval gate and the Venetian system that altered the approach and protected it from direct fire; the moat is both a military element and an archaeological zone sensitive to drainage and later interventions.

Single Approach
Single controlled landward approach.
Bridge & Moat
Bridge and deep moat separating the castle from the town side.
Screened Movement
Bent or screened movement reducing exposure of the inner court.
Thresholds
Guard chambers, murder zones, doors and changes of level.
05
Layers

After the Venetians: reuse, ship and museum

Ottoman, British and modern layers › the Kyrenia shipwreck, the museum and the harbour landscape

Kyrenia surrendered during the Ottoman conquest of Cyprus in 1570. The fortification continued to serve military and administrative purposes, but its role evolved within a different imperial network. Ottoman-period repairs, inscriptions, burials, installations and adaptations should be treated as integral evidence rather than as an epilogue to the medieval castle. The tomb traditionally identified with the commander Sadik Pasha forms part of this commemorative layer.

Garrison & Storage
Continuation of garrison and storage functions.
Reuse
Repair and reuse of Venetian and Lusignan spaces.
Phase Mapping
Material evidence requiring clearer phase mapping.
Commemoration
Commemorative traditions associated with the conquest.

British administration and modern reuse

During British administration the castle was used for policing, detention, military and storage purposes before developing as an archaeological monument and museum. Modern clearance, repair and museum installation made the monument accessible but also shaped what visitors perceive as authentic. Conservation history therefore belongs within the site narrative and should be recorded with the same care as medieval phases.

Uses
Police, prison, barrack and storage uses.
Recording
Antiquarian description and measured recording.
Access
Clearance, consolidation and adaptation for public access.
Museum Rooms
Museum rooms occupying historic spaces.

The Kyrenia shipwreck

The late fourth-century BCE merchant ship displayed within the castle is one of the most important ancient shipwreck discoveries in the Mediterranean. Located off Kyrenia in 1965 by Andreas Cariolou, it was excavated from 1968 under Michael Katzev and conserved and reconstructed after recovery. The hull, amphorae, millstones, almonds and other cargo evidence illuminate shipbuilding, trade, diet and seafaring centuries before the medieval fortress.

Hull
More than half of the wooden hull survived, an exceptional level of preservation.
Cargo
Cargo connected Cyprus with Aegean and eastern Mediterranean exchange.
Method
Excavation helped establish standards for underwater archaeology and hull reconstruction.
Not Castle Fabric
The ship is not part of the castle's construction history but is central to its museum significance.

Museum collections and the harbour landscape

The castle contains archaeological displays and reconstructed environments that extend its narrative beyond military architecture. The building itself should remain the principal exhibit. Castle, harbour, town and sea form a single cultural landscape: the fortress controlled movement through the port, while the port supplied the fortress and connected the northern coast with regional networks of trade, migration, pilgrimage and war.

Collections
Shipwreck gallery, maritime collections, archaeological material from Kyrenia and the wider region, and displays relating to medieval and early modern life.
Interpretation
Need for multilingual, source-linked and accessible interpretation.
Reciprocal Views
Reciprocal views between castle, harbour and town.
Port Logic
Surviving spatial logic of port defence and commerce.
Waterfront Archaeology
Underwater and waterfront archaeological potential.
Identity
Strong contemporary identity shaped by tourism and public memory.

Conservation and research history

Historic descriptions by Camille Enlart and George Jeffery, later measured surveys, underwater archaeology and recent digital documentation provide a substantial but uneven record. Future work should integrate archival drawings, masonry analysis, excavation records, photogrammetry and environmental monitoring in a shared chronological model.

Early Descriptions
Early architectural descriptions and plans.
Museum Documentation
Twentieth-century repair and museum documentation.
Ship Archives
Shipwreck excavation, conservation and reconstruction archives.
Digital Recording
Laser scanning and photogrammetric recording of medieval and Venetian fabric.
06
Story

The Sail with the Red Cross

Kyrenia Castle › a story

Kyrenia Castle

From the walls of Kyrenia Castle, young Yannis could identify most ships by the cut of their sails. He helped his father tend the harbour chain and watched merchants arrive with timber, grain, cloth, and news. One morning a galley appeared flying the red cross of the Knights Hospitaller of Rhodes.

The harbour guards prepared a friendly welcome, but Yannis noticed that the galley’s oars beat unevenly. Rhodian crews trained to move like a single body; these men rowed like strangers. He also saw the cross had been painted over an older black emblem.

The captain claimed to carry a sealed message for the Lusignan governor. While the officers argued, Yannis ran through the castle’s vaulted passageways and climbed the seaward tower. He lowered the harbour chain halfway—not enough to close the entrance, but enough to force the galley to slow. As its hull turned, hidden archers rose behind stacked cargo.

The governor ordered the chain raised. The trapped vessel struck it and lost its steering oar. After a brief struggle, the raiders surrendered. Their captain had hoped to enter Kyrenia under a trusted banner and seize the gate from within.

Three days later, the genuine Rhodian ship arrived. Its commander thanked Yannis and showed him how Hospitaller sailors stitched a small white thread into the centre of every official cross. Yannis kept such a thread tied around his wrist thereafter. He had learned that symbols could invite trust, but careful observation must decide whether trust was deserved. The castle guarded the harbour; vigilance guarded the castle.

Fiction. Yannis, his father, the galley, the raiders, the captain, the governor and the genuine Rhodian ship are invented; the source record documents no such episode. The story is a narrative device, kept apart from the documented history in the sections above. It draws on the record's themes of a harbour fortress, its defended approach and its links with Rhodes; the harbour chain, the false banner and the white thread in the cross are the story's own, and no date is given.
07
Gallery

Photo gallery

Five views › the courtyard ranges, a gate passage with heraldry, the domed church within the ramparts, the interior courtyard, and a map of the castle's place among ten medieval monuments of Cyprus

Image credits (Wikimedia Commons). None of these photographs were made for this project; all are reused under their original licences, changed only by conversion to JPEG and resizing for the web. Photos 1 to 4 — Michal Klajban, CC BY-SA 4.0. The map (image 5) is a Greek-language map supplied for the REBOOT project, with its own source line as printed on the map. Full credit lines and source pages for each photograph are also given when a photograph is opened above, and are repeated here for the printed record. Captions are those supplied with the photographs; the picture titles describe what is visible.
08
Context

Comparative significance

A palimpsest within one maritime setting › royal harbour fortress, Byzantine church, Venetian artillery works and an ancient shipwreck

Kyrenia is exceptional because a medieval royal harbour fortress, a Byzantine church, a major Venetian artillery transformation and an internationally important ancient shipwreck remain legible within one maritime setting.

Famagusta Fortifications
Larger urban and harbour defence adapted for artillery.
Kolossi Castle
Compact seigneurial stronghold with different economic and residential functions.
Saint Hilarion, Buffavento & Kantara
Mountain defence, refuge and communication network.
Rhodes & Eastern Mediterranean Ports
Comparable transitions from medieval towers to gunpowder fortification.
Bodrum Museum of Underwater Archaeology
Comparison of castle-based maritime museum practice.
09
Condition

Integrity, authenticity and risk

High as a layered harbour fortress and museum landscape › marine exposure, seismic risk and a sensitive collection

Enclosure and setting survive strongly despite rebuilding, lost interiors and modern adaptation. The ratings below are those of the record; “partial” and “fragmentary” mark losses within an otherwise legible element.

Venetian defensive envelope
The massive sixteenth-century ramparts and corner works that define the castle's image.
Exceptional
Lusignan fabric and circulation
Medieval entrance, tower and ranges survive in part, partly masked or absorbed by later work.
High / Partial
Church of Saint George
Byzantine domed church preserved inside the later fortress.
Exceptional
Harbour relationship
Reciprocal relationship with harbour and town, and sensitive to change.
High (sensitive)
Interior fittings and occupation evidence
Largely lost or only fragmentary.
Moderate / Fragmentary
Kyrenia ship and collection
An exceptional collection that depends on a tightly controlled environment.
Exceptional (environmentally sensitive)
Overall integrity
High as a layered harbour fortress and museum landscape.
High

Threats and management priorities

Marine Exposure
Marine salts, wind-driven moisture, water ingress and corrosion at the harbour edge.
Seismic Vulnerability
Massive walls, vaults, towers and earlier fabric enclosed within later work.
Stone Decay
Stone decay, biological growth, incompatible repair materials and loss of surface evidence.
Visitors
Visitor pressure, crowding, barriers, services and installations within sensitive spaces.
Ship & Collections
Environmental instability, fire and emergency risk affecting the ancient ship timbers and collections.
Harbour Setting
Development, traffic or commercial change affecting the harbour setting and key views.
Documentation & Narratives
Fragmented documentation and politicised or single-period interpretation.
10
Interpretation

Interpretation and the AI scenario

Public engagement and REBOOT application › phased chronology, military technology, builder attribution, shipwreck facts and political terminology

Phased fabric, harbour systems, artillery change and the life history of an ancient ship give the castle exceptional interpretive potential.

Core questions

Reading the Masonry
How can masonry reveal where Byzantine, Lusignan and Venetian structures meet?
Cannon Warfare
Why did cannon warfare change the shape of towers and walls?
Many Functions
How did a harbour castle function as residence, prison, store and symbol of authority?
Saint George
What does Saint George reveal about life before and within the later fortress?
The Ship
How was an ancient ship excavated, conserved and reconstructed?
One Landscape
How can the castle and harbour be interpreted as one maritime landscape?

Generative AI learning scenario

The Claim to Test
Learners test the claim that Kyrenia Castle was built by the Venetians in 1540, has survived unchanged, and contains a Roman warship discovered in its moat. They identify the mixture of plausible, oversimplified and false elements.
Phased Chronology
Replace a single construction date with a phased chronology.
Three Phases
Distinguish the Byzantine church, Lusignan enclosure and Venetian artillery works.
The Ship's Facts
Verify that the Kyrenia ship was a late fourth-century BCE merchant vessel found offshore.
Evidence
Compare architectural claims with plans, masonry evidence and scholarly sources.
Uncertainty
Label uncertainty around early dates and individual builder attributions.
Outputs
Create a source-linked route from harbour to gate, medieval fabric, church, ramparts and shipwreck gallery.
Terminology Audit
Audit generated text for political terminology, present-day claims and invented UNESCO status.
11
Assessment

Significance criteria

Eight-criteria framework › international importance

Rarity
A highly legible Byzantine-Lusignan-Venetian harbour fortress with an ancient shipwreck museum.
Exceptional
Representativeness
Demonstrates the transformation from medieval defence to artillery fortification.
Exceptional
Aesthetic value
Monumental sea-front massing, harbour views, courtyard, towers and layered masonry.
Exceptional
Integrity
Enclosure and setting survive strongly despite rebuilding, lost interiors and modern adaptation.
High
Historical value
Connected with conquest, Lusignan monarchy, Mediterranean warfare and maritime trade.
Exceptional
Social / cultural value
Defining landmark of Kyrenia and a powerful site of memory, education and tourism.
High
Scientific value
Fortification archaeology, Byzantine architecture, underwater archaeology and conservation.
Exceptional
Interpretive potential
Phased fabric, harbour systems, artillery change and the life history of an ancient ship.
Exceptional
Importance level
Recommended at international level, on the basis of an exceptional fortified palimpsest, harbour setting and Kyrenia shipwreck collection. The rating is analytical and no UNESCO designation is claimed. This document maps “International” to the highest rating class used on this page.
International

Importance level and heritage status

Basis
Exceptional fortified palimpsest, harbour setting and Kyrenia shipwreck collection.
Legal Context
The castle, outworks and moat are included in the Republic of Cyprus First Schedule of Ancient Monuments.
Formal Caution
Analytical rating; the castle is not presented as a UNESCO World Heritage property or current Tentative List entry.
Primary Sensitivity
Conservation and interpretation within the divided-island context, including access to records and collections.
12
Evidence

Source evaluation

Evidence quality › fabric, archaeology and scholarship against tourism and AI summaries

Building fabric
Masonry joints, towers, gates, vaults, gun positions, church and circulation reveal construction sequence.
Primary / High
Archaeology and ship records
Excavation, conservation and hull documentation underpin the shipwreck narrative.
Primary / High
Medieval and Venetian records
Sieges, expenditure and engineers require contextual reading and correlation with fabric.
High (selective)
Historic surveys
Enlart, Jeffery and later plans preserve observations before modern interventions.
High (period-specific)
Modern scholarship
Fortification studies and digital surveys refine chronology and architectural interpretation.
High
Tourism and AI summaries
Often collapse all phases into Venetian construction or misidentify the ship and its findspot.
Variable
Record summary — asset: Kyrenia Castle. Key value: layered harbour fortress joining Byzantine, Lusignan and Venetian military architecture. Date: Byzantine origins; major Lusignan c. 1208–1211 and Venetian c. 1540–1544 campaigns. Distinctive element: church of Saint George and museum display of the late fourth-century BCE Kyrenia ship. AI-literacy focus: phased chronology, military technology, builder attribution, shipwreck facts and political terminology. Photographs and an overview map of the ten Cyprus monuments were added to this page after the source record was written. This is a pilot record for review by the REBOOT team and relevant heritage specialists before final public use.

Statement of significance

“How can masonry reveal where Byzantine, Lusignan and Venetian structures meet?” (The first core question of the REBOOT_CY06 record.)

Kyrenia Castle is a monument of exceptional international significance for the history of fortification, maritime exchange and the layered cultural landscape of Cyprus. At the eastern edge of the historic harbour, it preserves the strategic relationship between sea route, port, town and the northern mountain corridor. Its fabric embodies repeated responses to political change and military technology from the Byzantine period through Lusignan, Venetian, Ottoman and British administration.

The Byzantine church of Saint George and traces of the early fortress establish a pre-Lusignan foundation. Major thirteenth-century works created a royal and military stronghold with defended gates, towers, vaulted spaces and accommodation. In the sixteenth century Venetian engineers transformed the enclosure for artillery, wrapping and cutting through medieval structures with massive ramparts and corner works. The resulting palimpsest makes the transition from medieval castle to gunpowder fortress unusually legible, while later Ottoman and British-period uses demonstrate continued adaptation rather than architectural stasis.

The castle's significance is amplified by the Kyrenia shipwreck, an exceptionally preserved late fourth-century BCE merchant vessel whose excavation, conservation and reconstruction transformed the study of ancient ships and Mediterranean trade. Although the wreck is not historically part of the fortress, its display beside the harbour creates a compelling museum relationship between vessel, seascape and place. High integrity survives in the enclosure, defensive massing, medieval elements and harbour setting, despite extensive rebuilding and modern intervention. Conservation should address marine exposure, seismic risk, vulnerable stonework, museum environments and development pressure while improving phase-based, multilingual and source-transparent interpretation. Kyrenia Castle is therefore assessed as a heritage asset of international importance whose value depends on safeguarding both its material layers and its maritime context.

National Status

The castle, outworks and moat are included in the Republic of Cyprus First Schedule of Ancient Monuments. The record identifies conservation and interpretation within the divided-island context, including access to records and collections, as the primary sensitivity.

International Status

Recommended importance level: international, based on an exceptional fortified palimpsest, harbour setting and Kyrenia shipwreck collection. The rating is analytical; the castle is not presented as a UNESCO World Heritage property or current Tentative List entry.

References

  1. Association for Historical Dialogue and Research. (2021). Cyprus: A classroom without walls, Volume 2. Exploring Kyrenia Castle. https://www.ahdr.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/EN_Cyprus_A_Classroom_Without_Walls_Vol2.pdf
  2. Camiz, A., Khalil, S. I., Demir, S. C., & Nafa, H. (2016). The Venetian defense of the Mediterranean: The Kyrenia Castle, Cyprus (1540–1544). In Defensive Architecture of the Mediterranean, Vol. III, 371–378. https://hdl.handle.net/11573/903984
  3. Camiz, A., et al. (2020). The Kyrenia Castle: An approach to digital documentation in the Cyprus Island. Disegnarecon, 13.
  4. Camiz, A., et al. (2023). An integrated approach to archaeological heritage: The Shipwreck Museum in the Kyrenia Castle, Cyprus. Restauro Archeologico.
  5. Enlart, C. (1987). Gothic art and the Renaissance in Cyprus (D. Hunt, Trans.). Trigraph.
  6. Jeffery, G. (1918). A description of the historic monuments of Cyprus. Government Printing Office.
  7. Katzev, M. L. (2005). The Kyrenia ship: Her recent journey. Near Eastern Archaeology, 68(1–2), 76–81.
  8. Keryneia Municipality. The Ship of Kyrenia. https://kyreniamunicipality.com/en/history-heritage/to-karavi-tis-keryneias/
  9. Petre, J. (2010). Crusader castles of Cyprus: The fortifications of Cyprus under the Lusignans, 1191–1489. Cardiff University. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/54199/
  10. Republic of Cyprus. Schedule of Ancient Monuments: The Castle of Kyrenia including the outworks and moat. https://www.cylaw.org/nomoi/enop/filemanager/files/ARCHAIOTITON_PINAKAS_A_304-2014KDP.pdf
  11. Steffy, J. R. (1994). Wooden ship building and the interpretation of shipwrecks. Texas A&M University Press.
  12. Walsh, M. J. K. (Ed.). (2015). City of empires: Ottoman and British Famagusta. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Comparative context for Cypriot fortifications and colonial reuse.
Erasmus+ KA220-HED REBOOT 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980
Created by CULTiNVEST