REBOOT ● Erasmus+ KA220-HEDProject No. 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980 Statement of Significance · Pilot Cyprus RecordWP2_T2.3.5 Skills Blueprint for Generative AI

Pilot Cyprus Record · Asset REBOOT_CY07 · Lusignan Cyprus, Kyrenia Mountain Range, Cyprus

Saint Hilarion Castle

Saint Hilarion Castle is a heritage asset of exceptional international significance for the study of Byzantine defence, Lusignan kingship and the transformation of mountain topography into architecture. Rising above the northern coastal plain, it formed part of a strategic network with Buffavento, Kantara and Kyrenia while controlling routes between coast and interior. Its dramatic setting is inseparable from its historical function and aesthetic power.

“Saint Hilarion Castle is a heritage asset of exceptional international significance for the study of Byzantine defence, Lusignan kingship and the transformation of mountain topography into architecture.” Central conclusion of the REBOOT_CY07 record

Exceptional High Moderate Low / Variable
00
Identity

Record, name & tradition

Western Kyrenia mountain range › a mountain fortress, a place of religious memory and a royal refuge

This statement assesses Saint Hilarion Castle as a mountain fortress, a place of religious memory and one of the most important surviving royal landscapes of Lusignan Cyprus. Its significance arises from the union of precipitous topography, Byzantine defensive planning, medieval siege history, courtly architecture and exceptional views across the northern coast.

Preferred Name
Saint Hilarion Castle.
Historic Identity
Byzantine mountain refuge and Lusignan royal fortress.
Current Identity
Protected ancient monument, archaeological ruin and visitor site.
Place
Western Kyrenia mountain range, Cyprus.
Type
Mountain fortress; religious site; royal residence and refuge.
Periods
Byzantine, Lusignan, Venetian, British colonial and modern Cyprus.
Scope
Topography, fortification, sacred architecture, royal life, conservation and cultural memory.
Record Status
Pilot record for REBOOT learning design, prepared September 2026 and intended for review by the REBOOT team and relevant Cyprus heritage specialists before final public use.

The record follows the preceding REBOOT Cyprus statements. It treats the monument as a phased complex, separates architectural evidence from legend, and links its conservation and interpretation with critical use of generative AI.

Name, saint and hermitage tradition

The castle takes its name from Saint Hilarion, but the identity of the holy figure and the precise history of an early hermitage are not securely documented. Later accounts connect an ascetic community with the summit before the development of the fortress. The church and associated rooms provide material evidence for Byzantine religious occupation; interpretation should distinguish this evidence from stories that conflate the site with the better-documented fourth-century Saint Hilarion of Gaza or present an uninterrupted monastic history as fact.

Place-Name
A saintly or eremitic association preserved in the place-name.
Byzantine Church
Byzantine church as the principal standing evidence of religious use.
Dieu d'Amour
Medieval western names including Dieu d'Amour as part of the castle's reception history.
Labelling
Need to label later legend, etymology and historical evidence separately.
Naming and writing principles: use Saint Hilarion Castle as the preferred English name. Distinguish the historical saint and hermitage tradition from later folklore. Avoid presenting every visible building as Lusignan or every royal attribution as certain. Describe the present political and management context factually and do not imply UNESCO World Heritage status.
01
Setting

A castle made of mountain

A jagged limestone summit about 725 m above sea level › topography as the principal defensive material

Saint Hilarion occupies a jagged limestone summit in the western Kyrenia mountain range, approximately 725 metres above sea level. The castle rises above the pass linking Kyrenia with the Mesaoria and commands extensive views over the northern coastal plain and Mediterranean. Here topography is not a backdrop but the principal defensive material: cliffs, narrow ridges, steep paths and twin peaks divide movement, shape the three wards and create a dramatic sequence from lower enceinte to upper royal apartments and summit defences.

High Peak
High limestone peak with naturally inaccessible northern and eastern faces.
Routes
Control of routes between Kyrenia, Nicosia and the northern coast.
Surveillance
Long-range surveillance and possible visual communication with other strongholds.
Views
Exceptional reciprocal views between castle, mountain chain, plain and sea.

Byzantine foundation and defence

The castle developed in the Byzantine period, commonly dated to the late eleventh century, as part of a northern defensive system that included Buffavento and Kantara. Its purpose was to observe maritime approaches, protect inland routes and provide refuge during attack. Rough masonry walls follow the contours rather than impose a regular geometric plan; towers, gates and successive enclosures convert the mountain into a defence in depth.

Contour-Following Walls
Walls adapted to rock and steep slopes.
Semicircular Towers
Semicircular towers reinforcing the lower enceinte.
Summit Buildings
Religious and domestic buildings within the defensive summit.
Regional System
Part of a regional system rather than an isolated lookout.
02
History

Chronology and building phases

Byzantine refuge to Lusignan royal fortress › the exact chronology of individual stretches requires fabric analysis

The exact chronology of individual stretches of wall requires fabric analysis and should not be reduced to a single foundation date.

Before c. 1100
Religious or eremitic tradition associated with the summit; precise beginnings uncertain.
Late 11th century
Byzantine church and principal early fortification phase.
12th century
Narthex and rooms added to the church complex; defensive occupation continues.
1191–1192
Conquest by Richard I and transition to Lusignan rule.
1228–1233
Castle central to conflict between imperial and Ibelin parties during Henry I's minority.
13th–14th centuries
Major Lusignan strengthening and creation of residential and royal spaces.
15th–16th centuries
Decline, abandonment and Venetian dismantling of mountain defences.
19th–20th centuries
Documentation, clearance, conservation and renewed military relevance.
Present
Managed archaeological monument and visitor destination.

War of the Lombards

Saint Hilarion became a focal point in the struggle between supporters of Emperor Frederick II and the Ibelin party during the minority of King Henry I. The conflict of 1228–1233, often called the War of the Lombards, tested the castle's capacity for refuge, siege and political control. The episode demonstrates that possession of a fortress carried symbolic and constitutional meaning.

Imperial Intervention
Imperial intervention during Frederick II's Sixth Crusade.
Regency Claims
Rival claims concerning regency and governance of Cyprus.
Resistance
Prolonged resistance and changing control of mountain fortresses.
Coast Connections
Evidence for connections with Kyrenia and the coastal plain.
03
Fabric

Three wards, gate and church

Defence in depth on rising levels › access, supply, garrison, worship and residence distributed according to topography and hierarchy

Saint Hilarion is organised into three principal defensive units on rising levels. The wards should not be understood as wholly separate construction campaigns: Byzantine structures were retained, strengthened and reinterpreted during Lusignan rule, while later abandonment and conservation altered the legibility of routes and rooms.

Lower Ward
Outer defence, stabling, stores and garrison accommodation.
Middle Ward
Principal gate, church, service buildings, hall and earlier residential spaces.
Upper Ward
Royal apartments, kitchens, cisterns and summit defences.
Controlled Paths
Narrow controlled paths and gates connecting successive levels.

Lower ward and garrison landscape

The lowest and broadest ward provided the first defended enclosure and the logistical base of the castle. A long wall strengthened by semicircular towers protected the accessible southern approaches, while steep rock reduced the need for continuous masonry elsewhere. Fragments of barracks, stables, storage and working areas evoke the less visible population that maintained the fortress.

Approach
Main approach and defended outer entrance.
Seven Towers
Seven semicircular towers along the lower Byzantine enceinte.
Garrison
Accommodation for soldiers and spaces associated with animals and supplies.
Everyday Life
Archaeological potential for everyday life, food and craft activity.

Middle ward and main gate

Access to the middle ward passes through a substantial Byzantine building adapted by the Lusignans with a vaulted passage and a movable bridge. The sequence demonstrates how inherited architecture was reinforced rather than simply replaced. Within this ward, church, hall, service rooms, kitchens, storerooms and a belvedere bring military, religious and residential functions into close proximity.

Byzantine Gate
Two-storey Byzantine gate structure.
Lusignan Passage
Lusignan vaulted passage and bridge mechanism.
Transition
Controlled transition between the service ward and elite areas above.
Fabric
Important concentration of Byzantine and fourteenth-century fabric.

Church of Saint Hilarion

The church, generally dated to the late eleventh century, is the key surviving monument of the Byzantine religious phase. Its compact, irregular plan responds to limited space on the rock and preserves the remains of a dome supported on eight composite piers. A narthex and adjoining rooms were added in the twelfth century. The roof and painted decoration have been lost, but wall construction, plaster treatments, apse and subsidiary spaces retain evidence for worship and community life.

Interior
Trapezoidal interior approximately 9.8 by 7.3 metres.
Dome
Domed core supported by eight piers.
Apse & Narthex
Eastern apse and later trapezoidal narthex.
Adjacent Rooms
Adjacent vaulted and domed rooms associated with the religious complex.
04
Royal

Lusignan fortress and royal apartments

Security, government and courtly life › a summer palace is plausible but can be overstated

Under Lusignan rule Saint Hilarion was strengthened as a major royal fortress and developed as a residence. Pointed vaults, defended passages, halls, kitchens, apartments and carefully framed views demonstrate the combination of security, administration and courtly life. The idea of a summer palace is plausible but can be overstated: the castle remained an austere, difficult and strategically important site, and its residential architecture should be interpreted through the demands of royal refuge and governance as well as leisure.

Rebuilding
Extensive thirteenth- and fourteenth-century rebuilding.
Royal Accommodation
Royal and high-status accommodation integrated with military circulation.
Gothic Features
Gothic arches, vaults, windows and external galleries.
Cisterns & Services
Cisterns and service buildings supporting prolonged occupation.

Upper ward and royal apartments

A steep path and defended entrance lead to the highest ward. Here an elongated residential block contained a vaulted lower room and cistern, with upper chambers reached by a broad stair and once connected by an external colonnade or gallery. The surviving Gothic window with stone seats frames the northern landscape and is popularly called the Queen's Window. Its value lies in the material relationship between architecture, controlled view, climate and elite experience, not in an unverified association with a particular queen.

Residential Block
Fourteenth-century residential block on the western side.
Vaults & Cistern
Vaulted ground floor, cistern and upper rooms formerly roofed in timber.
External Circulation
External circulation overlooking the coast.
Carved Windows
Carved windows and benches expressing comfort within a defensive setting.

Belvedere, windows and experience

The belvedere and residential windows turn the panoramic setting into an architectural experience. Views could support surveillance, but they also provided light, ventilation, status and pleasure. Experiential study can reconstruct movement, visibility, sound, temperature and effort without claiming certainty about individual emotions; ascent and changing views remain central to understanding the monument.

Arches & Vaults
Pointed arches and vaulted viewing spaces.
Framed Views
Framed views toward Kyrenia, Lapithos and the Mediterranean.
Passages & Prospects
Contrasts between confined passages and open prospects.
Digital Access
Potential for accessible digital interpretation where physical ascent is difficult.
05
Layers

Water, legend, decline and reception

What sustained the summit, and what was later said about it › dismantling, conservation history and cultural memory

A fortress on an exposed summit depended on stored water and carefully organised supply. Numerous cisterns occur at different levels, reducing dependence on a single reservoir and supporting garrison, animals, religious community and royal household. Water systems are among the most important but least visible elements of significance; catchments, channels, plaster linings and access points should be mapped and monitored because failure affects both archaeological understanding and structural conservation.

Cisterns
Multiple rock-cut and built cisterns across the three wards.
Rainfall
Collection of seasonal rainfall from roofs and paved surfaces.
Siege Resilience
Storage, kitchens and animal accommodation linked to siege resilience.
Drainage
Drainage as a continuing conservation priority.

Prince John's Tower and legend

A high tower on an isolated spur is traditionally associated with Prince John of Antioch and a story in which his Bulgarian guards were thrown from the windows after court intrigue. The story is valuable as cultural memory but should not be presented as established architectural fact. Interpretation can use it to teach how chronicles, oral traditions, place-names and physical settings combine to create persuasive historical narratives.

Remote Tower
Remote tower occupying a highly defensible rocky projection.
Tradition
Traditional association with events in the fourteenth century.
Comparison
Opportunity to compare chronicle evidence, later retellings and fabric.
Labelling
Clear labelling of legend, probability and verified history.

Late medieval decline and dismantling

Changes in warfare, administration and the cost of maintaining remote garrisons reduced the strategic value of the mountain castles. By the later Lusignan and Venetian periods, Saint Hilarion was increasingly abandoned and parts were deliberately disabled to prevent hostile occupation. Dismantling is itself a significant historical action: collapsed roofs, broken defences and incomplete rooms are not simply natural decay.

Declining Use
Declining permanent use after the fourteenth century.
Venetian Priorities
Venetian concentration on coastal and urban artillery defences.
Slighting
Deliberate slighting or demolition of vulnerable mountain strongholds.
Weathering
Long-term weathering after loss of roofs and maintenance.

Modern conflict and conservation history

The castle was documented, cleared and consolidated during British administration, and archival records preserve surveys and interventions from the twentieth century. Its commanding position also gave it renewed military relevance during modern conflict. Repairs, paths, rails, signs and visitor facilities shape present experience and must be recorded as part of the monument's biography.

Recording
Antiquarian and architectural recording by Enlart, Jeffery and later researchers.
Archives
Department of Antiquities survey and controlled-area archives from the twentieth century.
Modern Conflict
Modern military occupation and damage as historically sensitive subjects.
Need
Need for an accessible intervention chronology and materials inventory.

Cultural reception and popular imagery

Saint Hilarion has become an emblem of romantic medieval Cyprus. Its silhouette, winding ascent and ruined royal apartments encourage comparisons with storybook castles and have generated unverified claims about direct inspiration for modern fictional architecture. Popular imagery can attract care and curiosity, but it should not replace the site's Byzantine, Lusignan and modern histories.

Silhouette
Powerful silhouette within the Kyrenia mountain landscape.
Romance
Association with romance, queens, princes and inaccessible refuge.
Film & Animation
Frequently repeated but poorly evidenced links with film and animation castles.
Shared Memory
Shared yet politically sensitive place in Cypriot memory.
06
Story

The Queen’s Falcon

Saint Hilarion Castle › a story

Saint Hilarion Castle

Mist wrapped Saint Hilarion Castle so tightly that its towers seemed to float above Cyprus. During a royal visit, the queen’s white falcon escaped from its perch and vanished among the crags. Mara, the daughter of the castle falconer, followed it upward through passages known only to servants and goats.

Near the highest tower she heard voices beyond a ruined cistern. Two men were arranging mirrors aimed toward the plain. At sunset, they planned to flash a signal to rebels waiting near the road to Nicosia: the queen’s escort was small, and the mountain gate would be opened from within.

Mara dared not descend by the same path. She released the falcon again, this time with a strip of the queen’s blue ribbon tied to its leg. The bird circled through the mist and flew toward its keeper in the lower courtyard. Mara’s father recognized the ribbon as their private sign for danger above.

The guards climbed silently and seized the signalmen before sunset. To mislead the rebels, Mara turned the mirrors toward the sea and flashed the agreed pattern at the wrong hour. The waiting riders withdrew, believing the plot discovered.

At supper, the queen offered Mara a place among the court attendants. Mara declined. She preferred the wind, the birds, and the high paths of Saint Hilarion. The queen laughed and gave her a silver whistle instead.

Years later, travellers told of a white falcon guarding the castle’s peaks. Mara never corrected them. Legends, she thought, were like mountain mist: they concealed many details, yet sometimes revealed the shape of a truth.

Fiction. Mara, her father the falconer, the queen, the white falcon, the two signalmen, the rebels, the mirrors, the blue ribbon and the silver whistle are invented; the source record documents no such episode. The story is a narrative device, kept apart from the documented history in the sections above. It draws on the record's themes of a mountain fortress, its royal apartments and routes, and the legends attached to it; its queen is unnamed and unidentified (the record cautions against tying the Queen's Window to any particular queen), and no date is given.
07
Gallery

Photo gallery

Five views › the castle on its mountain, the summit seen from Kyrenia, the stair to the Byzantine church, a panoramic view, and a map of the castle's place among ten medieval monuments of Cyprus

Image credits (Wikimedia Commons). None of these photographs were made for this project; all are reused under their original licences, changed only by conversion to JPEG and resizing for the web. Photo 1 — Atak Kara, public domain as stated on Commons. Photo 2 — Xenophon, CC BY-SA 3.0. Photo 3 — Dickelbers, CC BY-SA 3.0. Photo 4 — Zairon, CC BY-SA 4.0. The map (image 5) is a Greek-language map supplied for the REBOOT project, with its own source line as printed on the map. Full credit lines and source pages for each photograph are also given when a photograph is opened above, and are repeated here for the printed record. Captions are those supplied with the photographs; the picture titles describe what is visible. Photo 2 was taken across the rooftops of Kyrenia and includes modern rooftop equipment in the foreground.
08
Context

Comparative significance

Exceptional among the castles of Cyprus › for the survival and legibility of religious, military, service and royal spaces

Saint Hilarion is exceptional among the castles of Cyprus for the survival and legibility of religious, military, service and royal spaces across three dramatic mountain wards.

Buffavento & Kantara
Related Byzantine-Lusignan mountain fortresses with differing preservation and strategic reach.
Kyrenia Castle
Complementary harbour fortress controlling the coast below.
Kolossi Castle
Compact lowland lordly residence and estate centre.
Crusader Fortresses of the Levant
Defence in depth, refuge and adaptation of terrain.
European Royal Castles
Comparison of courtly residence, prospect and governance in fortified settings.
09
Condition

Integrity, authenticity and risk

High as a three-ward mountain fortress › rock stability, drainage, fire and visitor safety

The three wards and key functional relationships remain legible despite major losses. The ratings below are those of the record; “partial” and “fragmentary” mark losses within an otherwise legible element.

Topographic defensive system
Cliffs, ridges, paths and wards working together as a single defence.
Exceptional
Byzantine walls and church
Byzantine enceinte, towers, gate structures and the late eleventh-century church.
High / Exceptional
Lusignan residential fabric
Residential block, vaulted rooms and windows survive in part.
High / Partial
Cisterns and service infrastructure
Cisterns and service buildings across the three wards.
High
Roofs, floors and fittings
Largely lost or only fragmentary.
Low / Fragmentary
Mountain and coastal setting
Exceptional setting, and sensitive to infrastructure and development in key views.
Exceptional (sensitive)
Overall integrity
High as a three-ward mountain fortress.
High

Threats and management priorities

Rock & Masonry
Seismic vulnerability, unstable rock, falling masonry and exposed wall heads.
Weather
Intense rainfall, drainage failure, freeze-thaw at elevation, wind and temperature variation.
Erosion
Erosion of steep visitor paths, steps and archaeological deposits.
Safety Measures
Safety pressures that may introduce visually intrusive barriers or excessive reconstruction.
Fire & Access
Wildfire, vegetation growth and difficult emergency access.
Landscape Character
Loss of landscape character through infrastructure or development in key views.
Narratives
Simplified, legendary or politically selective interpretation.
10
Interpretation

Interpretation and the AI scenario

Public engagement and REBOOT application › phased chronology, evidence versus legend, topographic defence and political narrative

Topography, siege, courtly life, evidence testing and accessible digital reconstruction give the castle exceptional interpretive potential.

Core questions

Three Stages
How did builders turn a mountain into a three-stage defensive system?
Phases
What evidence distinguishes Byzantine, Lusignan and modern work?
Supply
How did water, food and animals reach and sustain the summit?
Royal Spaces
What makes royal apartments different from garrison spaces?
Legends
How should the Queen's Window and Prince John's Tower legends be presented?
Digital Access
How can digital access communicate a site that many visitors cannot safely climb?

Generative AI learning scenario

The Claim to Test
Learners test the claim that Saint Hilarion was built in one campaign by a Lusignan queen as a summer palace and later inspired a famous animated castle. They separate architectural evidence, reasonable interpretation and unsupported legend.
Phases
Replace the single-date narrative with Byzantine, Lusignan, Venetian and modern phases.
Church & Residence
Distinguish the church and hermitage tradition from the royal residence.
Three Wards
Verify the function of the three wards and the evidence for courtly use.
War of the Lombards
Trace the War of the Lombards through reliable historical sources.
Confidence Labels
Label the Queen's Window, Prince John and popular-culture claims by confidence level.
Outputs
Create a source-linked ascent route connecting topography, defence, water and views.
Audit
Audit generated text for invented quotations, rulers, dates and UNESCO status.
11
Assessment

Significance criteria

Eight-criteria framework › international importance

Rarity
Outstanding survival of a Byzantine-Lusignan mountain fortress with royal accommodation.
Exceptional
Representativeness
Clearly demonstrates defence in depth and the adaptation of extreme terrain.
Exceptional
Aesthetic value
Silhouette, ascent, framed views, ruins and mountain-coast setting.
Exceptional
Integrity
Three wards and key functional relationships remain legible despite major losses.
High
Historical value
Byzantine defence, Lusignan monarchy, Ibelin conflict and Venetian strategy.
Exceptional
Social / cultural value
A powerful landmark shaped by local memory, legend, education and tourism.
High
Scientific value
Fortification archaeology, sacred architecture, water systems and conservation science.
High
Interpretive potential
Topography, siege, courtly life, evidence testing and accessible digital reconstruction.
Exceptional
Importance level
Recommended at international level, on the basis of exceptional mountain fortification, a Byzantine church, Lusignan royal architecture and landscape integrity. The rating is analytical and no UNESCO designation is claimed. This document maps “International” to the highest rating class used on this page.
International

Importance level and heritage status

Basis
Exceptional mountain fortification, Byzantine church, Lusignan royal architecture and landscape integrity.
Legal Context
Protected under the antiquities framework of the Republic of Cyprus.
Formal Caution
Analytical rating; Saint Hilarion is not presented as a UNESCO World Heritage property or current Tentative List entry.
Primary Sensitivity
Conservation, access and interpretation within the divided-island context.
12
Evidence

Source evaluation

Evidence quality › fabric and scholarship against tourism, folklore and AI summaries

Building fabric and terrain
Walls, gates, church, apartments, cisterns and paths reveal chronology and function.
Primary / High
Medieval chronicles
Essential for political events but shaped by authorship, audience and retrospective narrative.
High (partisan)
Historic surveys
Enlart, Jeffery and Department records preserve evidence before later interventions.
High (period-specific)
Modern scholarship
Castle archaeology, spatial analysis and Lusignan history refine functional interpretation.
High
Official heritage sources
Detailed architectural account; terminology reflects the divided-island context.
High for description and status
Tourism, folklore and AI
Often repeat unsupported royal, saintly or popular-culture claims.
Variable
Record summary — asset: Saint Hilarion Castle. Key value: exceptional three-ward Byzantine and Lusignan mountain fortress and royal landscape. Date: principal Byzantine phase late eleventh century; major Lusignan development thirteenth–fourteenth centuries. Distinctive element: church, royal apartments, Queen's Window, cisterns and precipitous summit setting. AI-literacy focus: phased chronology, evidence versus legend, topographic defence and political narrative. Photographs and an overview map of the ten Cyprus monuments were added to this page after the source record was written. This is a pilot record for review by the REBOOT team and relevant heritage specialists before final public use.

Statement of significance

“How did builders turn a mountain into a three-stage defensive system?” (The first core question of the REBOOT_CY07 record.)

Saint Hilarion Castle is a heritage asset of exceptional international significance for the study of Byzantine defence, Lusignan kingship and the transformation of mountain topography into architecture. Rising above the northern coastal plain, it formed part of a strategic network with Buffavento, Kantara and Kyrenia while controlling routes between coast and interior. Its dramatic setting is inseparable from its historical function and aesthetic power.

The monument preserves a rare sequence of three defensive wards. Byzantine walls, towers, gate structures and the late eleventh-century church establish its religious and military origins. Lusignan rebuilding added vaulted passages, halls, service areas, cisterns and royal apartments, creating a fortified residence in which security, government, worship and courtly experience were closely integrated. Its role in the conflict between Frederick II's supporters and the Ibelin party demonstrates the political importance of controlling strongholds and royal space. The upper apartments, belvedere and framed coastal views are especially significant evidence for elite life within an austere defensive landscape.

Abandonment, Venetian dismantling, exposure and modern conservation have reduced completeness but have not destroyed the legibility of the castle's organisation. The surviving relationship between rock, walls, ascent, water systems, sacred space and residence gives the site exceptional integrity. Legends attached to the saint, the Queen's Window and Prince John's Tower enrich cultural meaning when clearly distinguished from verified history. Conservation should prioritise structural and rock stability, drainage, wall-head protection, safe access and landscape setting, while digital interpretation should widen access without replacing direct engagement with the place. Saint Hilarion is therefore assessed as a monument of international importance whose significance depends on protecting the entire mountain ensemble and presenting its evidence with precision and transparency.

National Status

Protected under the antiquities framework of the Republic of Cyprus. The record identifies conservation, access and interpretation within the divided-island context as the primary sensitivity.

International Status

Recommended importance level: international, based on exceptional mountain fortification, a Byzantine church, Lusignan royal architecture and landscape integrity. The rating is analytical; Saint Hilarion is not presented as a UNESCO World Heritage property or current Tentative List entry.

References

  1. Camiz, A., et al. (2018). The Dieu d'Amour castle in Cyprus, from Byzantine settlement to Frankish palace. FORTMED proceedings.
  2. Coureas, N. (2005). The fortifications of Lusignan Cyprus. In Crusades and the military orders: Expanding the frontiers of medieval Latin Christianity.
  3. Cyprus Department of Antiquities. Saint Hilarion Castle. Important Archaeological Sites and Monuments in Occupied Cyprus. https://www.culture.gov.cy/dmculture/DA/DA.nsf/All/9d221a3b866e97bac2257276003b353f
  4. Edbury, P. W. (1991). The Kingdom of Cyprus and the Crusades, 1191–1374. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Enlart, C. (1987). Gothic art and the Renaissance in Cyprus (D. Hunt, Trans.). Trigraph.
  6. Hill, G. (1948). A history of Cyprus, Volume II: The Frankish period, 1192–1432. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Jeffery, G. (1918). A description of the historic monuments of Cyprus. Government Printing Office.
  8. Marshall, C. (1996). Warfare in the Latin East, 1192–1291. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Morelle, N. (2014). The Castle of Kantara: A key to the evolution of active defence in the 13th century between the Eastern and Western worlds. Château Gaillard, 27.
  10. Petre, J. (2010). Crusader castles of Cyprus: The fortifications of Cyprus under the Lusignans, 1191–1489. Cardiff University. https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/54199/
  11. Republic of Cyprus State Archives. Department of Antiquities Minute Papers, ANTQ1/978 and ANTQ1/1379–1380, Saint Hilarion Castle surveys and controlled area.
  12. Siammou, A. (2020). Windows, atmospheres and experience in medieval Cypriot castles. University of Glasgow. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/81896/
Erasmus+ KA220-HED REBOOT 2025-1-CY01-KA220-HED-000351980
Created by CULTiNVEST